Deputy Says He Shot 'Irrational' Marine to Protect Kids in Car
15-year veteran of Sheriff's Department says Sgt. Manny Loggins was about to drive away, so he opened fire to prevent a perceived danger to Loggins' daughters. One other deputy was nearby at the time.
The deputy who shot and killed an unarmed Marine sergeant after a predawn traffic stop said the Marine was acting so "irrationally" that it seemed dangerous to let him drive away with his two daughters, an official said Friday.
So when the Marine -- later identified as Sgt. Manny Loggins Jr. of Camp Pendleton -- climbed back into his GMC Yukon and turned the ignition, the deputy opened fire, according to Jim Amormino, a spokesman for the Orange County Sheriff's Department.
Amormino stressed that he was merely relaying statements made by the deputy to investigators and "not defending" what happened.
"This was a very tragic event, we all feel bad for the family," Amormino said.
The deputy, a 15-year veteran, told investigators he was parked at San Clemente High School writing reports when he spotted Loggins driving "at a high rate of speed" before turning into the lot and crashing into a gate near the football field.
The deputy pulled up behind Loggins and radioed for backup. It was about 4:40 a.m. Tuesday.
Loggins, 31, stepped out of the Yukon and walked off into the darkness toward the football field, ignoring a series of commands made by the deputy. His two daughters, ages 9 and 14, remained in the vehicle.
Other deputies soon arrived and formed a perimeter around the back end of the football field in case Loggins was trying to flee, Amormino said. Because it was dark, nobody could see where Loggins was.
"About five minutes later, Loggins walked back toward the Yukon," Amormino said.
The deputy issued "a new set of commands" which Loggins again didn't follow, Amormino said.
"Due to Loggins' failure to follow the commands and his irrational behavior, including statements he made, the deputy had a deep concern for the safety of the children," Amormino said. "In the deputy's mind, it was unsafe for [Loggins] to drive away with the girls."
Amormino said he couldn't disclose what the alleged "irrational" behaviors or statements entailed, but said Loggins didn't appear to be intoxicated.
When Loggins got back into the Yukon and either started the engine or began trying to drive away, the deputy opened fire, shooting Loggins through the driver side window, which shattered. (The girls were in the back seat and not injured.)
Amormino acknowledged that this version of events differs from an earlier account released by the Sheriff's Department, in which the deputy reportedly opened fire because he feared for his own life.
"The real threat was for the lives of the children," Amormino said Friday. In a case like this, "some information becomes immediately available and some takes longer to get because witnesses have to be interviewed," he noted.
Amormino said this account came from the deputy who fired the shots. Another deputy was nearby, but "I don't know what he saw," Amormino said.
Loggins' daughters were also interviewed by investigators, but Amormino said he didn't know what they said or if their story lined up with the deputy's.
In addition, KABC-TV said the incident was taped on the deputy's dashboard video camera.
"Whatever the truth is will come out," Amormino said, noting that "a complete and thorough investigation" would be conducted by the Orange County District Attorney's office, which investigates all officer-involved shootings.
Results of the autopsy on Loggins probably won't be made public for a few weeks, after toxicology tests are finished and the sheriff reviews the findings, he said.
Loggins' friends and colleagues have questioned official accounts of what happened, describing the Illinois native as a kind and faith-filled Christian family man who would never disobey authorities or jeopardize the safety of his daughters.
Feb. 14 UPDATE: Deputies union issues a statement defending the shooting. Click here to read the story.
carlotta cuervo
4:43 pm on Friday, February 10, 2012
Why didn't the deputy shoot out the tires?
Nancy
5:11 pm on Friday, February 10, 2012
EXACTLY!
Bo Bo
10:01 am on Monday, February 13, 2012
All u had to do was block the car. He ran into a gate.
Forget shooting the tires.
desimal
4:47 pm on Friday, February 10, 2012
WOW, REALLY?!!
Cleo Hall
10:25 am on Saturday, February 11, 2012
The sheriff didn't know the kids were in the back seat of the car. The sheriff DID NOT KNOW the kids were in the back seat of the car. The back glass on each side is always tinted so the sheriff thought manny was along in the vehicle with no eye witnesses. Those girls are old enough to tell some of the story. The sheriff was definitely not interested in the girls safety!! WAITING TO HEAR THE TRUE STORY.
james Nasmith
6:15 pm on Monday, February 13, 2012
Well seeing as the the former sheriff now resides in federal custody and Mr. Armormino should be sitting right along side him is any of this B,S. from this department taken seriously? of course another deputy is going to back up whatever story that they are told to.
LMiller
4:48 pm on Friday, February 10, 2012
Amazing! What a Terrible tragedy! Praying for the family!
Douglas Martin
5:03 pm on Friday, February 10, 2012
Let's hope there are no OCSD calls for service at Big Helyn's tonight.
Chalino Sanchez
5:06 pm on Friday, February 10, 2012
WTF? Who are you trying to kid! Our hard earned tax dollars at work again.
CriticalThinkerInFV
5:18 pm on Friday, February 10, 2012
Police use deadly force to do just that kill not shoot out tires or shoot arms and legs. This guy should have followed commands, he was a marine. I dont know if the shooting was justified but before you become outraged think about the situtation and police protocol that keeps all of us safe.
Chris McLaughlin
6:23 pm on Friday, February 10, 2012
Dude, even Amormino went on record saying he's 'not defending' their actions, just relaying their statements. The police must know how much this really smells bad for them. Changing their whole story around now, saying he did call for backup, that there were more deputies present, and they still gunned him down through the window??
Hello Margaret Mueller, you were saying??????
Roy Rivenburg
8:24 pm on Friday, February 10, 2012
Margaret, please make your points without calling people names. Thanks.
Tonto
7:08 pm on Saturday, February 11, 2012
If they have to kill you to save you it appears :(
Pacific _waters
5:51 am on Sunday, February 12, 2012
If there was no immediate threat there was no reason for the use of deadly force. Simply based on the information provided the actions of the deputy were a clear violation of almost every department's policy concerning deadly force. If a Marine if Afghanistan had acted in the same manner he would be up on charges. The deputy should charged.
Nick Newton
5:19 pm on Friday, February 10, 2012
Since when is being 'irrational' punishable by death? Sounds like maybe they shouldn't be issued real bullets.
chris adams
9:37 pm on Saturday, February 11, 2012
since the actions of the deputy were irrational shouldnt he face the same treatment ? and since deputies represent an elected sherrif shouldnt he also face the same equal treatment that his deputy dished out to an irrational civilian?
Susan McGraw Keber
5:23 pm on Friday, February 10, 2012
Based on mere suspicion, the deputy shot the father of two girls through the driver's side window...did he think of the impact of that action as the young girls watched this happen? This was extremely poor judgement on the deputy's part...he did not like that the man would not obey his commands and he himself became angry. The man brandished no weapon. Made no vocal threats. This is horrible!
V. Duvall
6:29 pm on Friday, February 10, 2012
Susan,You cannot know if the victim brandished a weapon or if there were any "vocal threats" unless you were there
Ms. Air Force
6:53 pm on Friday, February 10, 2012
Susan,
The PD has changed their story all ready! He was unarmed there was no weapon found at the scene.. At first the deputy feared for his life and now he was afraid for is daughter.. Are you freakin' kiddin' me?!
**Justice for Manny**
Ms. Air Force
6:54 pm on Friday, February 10, 2012
To make matters worse.. he was concerned for the children and yet fired into the truck.. hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm.... total lapse in judgement!
Roy Rivenburg
6:56 pm on Friday, February 10, 2012
The Sheriff's Department told Patch there was no evidence Loggins was armed.
Margaret Mueller
7:43 pm on Friday, February 10, 2012
SUSAN, I dont believe the article said anything about YOU being there witnessing this.........so dont say things unless you know for sure. How do you know he "did not like the man because he didnt obey him"........thats silly. They neither like nor dislike a person...they do there job...and that is exactly what he did.....protected the lives of those girls.
Margaret Mueller
7:49 pm on Friday, February 10, 2012
AIR FORCE CHICK - The Sheriff never changed his story as you say. They NEVER said he had a "weapon" which people mistakenly think can only be a gun. If you look at Douglas Martins post below....you will see exactly what the Deputy put out on the radio..........want on the subject was Child endangerment....not fear of his life....
Steve
5:45 pm on Friday, February 10, 2012
This is OUT OF CONTROL! Based on the info so far this looks like ANOTHER poor representative of law enforcement. Use of deadly force is becoming the first choice instead of last resort.
How can we as citizens continue to let all of these people get away with "poor" judgement with minimal consequences, (Police, Politicians, Church leaders, Teachers, etc....) the get "above the laws treatment" by causing irreparable damages then do little if any jail time & receive full retirement benefits & often hired else where. While the law abiding citizens continue to turn a blind eye & in some cases defend these degenerates, WAKE UP!
James
5:52 pm on Friday, February 10, 2012
CriticalThinkerInFV is correct, they use their weapon only to attempt to kill. There are too many dangers in shooting at a metal tire that has metal could bounce and hit someone else or anything else. Their weapon is usually a last resort where they feel death of themselves or others is imminent. If he drove off erratically could kids have possibly got hurt? Possibly, but there was no weapon threat, i don't know if you could say they were in immediate threat of death. As well i find it odd, if i was arrested for shooting someone and changed my story several times, I think the police detectives would be all in my ass about what the truth is. I agree i dont think any child would agree i would prefer you shoot my father to death in front of me because you thought he may have been acting weird. "This guy should have followed commands, he was a marine. " that is the stupidest comment ever. Just because your a Marine dont mean your a dog. He is a Sergeant of Marines, a Sergeant in the Marines can understand a lawful order and what doesnt sound right. Again we don't know that he heard correctly or what with the half ass reports they keep giving.... Again I am a Marine, and also generally I am all for supporting the police and their decisions they have a super hard job; but for this duputy's sake i hope they can some how prove this Marine had gone crazy becuase right now they are not looking good at all. The daughters may be only hope for Sgt Loggins getting justice.
Christine A Hall
12:54 am on Sunday, February 12, 2012
James, w/ you in your comment 99% except the 1% - two words... "frangible ammunition". Would have done the damage to the tires, yet not ricocheted to hurt anyone else. (In fact, frangible ammo WILL kill someone, but not "pass thru" and enter others or go thru walls.)
Was the LEO so far away he couldn't have tased him?? Inquiring minds want to know! Any good officer is already carrying a Taser on his belt!
Why didn't the officer just pepper spray him? Even SOCCER MOMS carry pepper spray for God's sake! (Some even carry tasers! LOL) OC Co. is big enough that I'd lay my last dollar on the table that every one of those officers carry tasers - they'd be fools not to! Not w/ all the drugged criminals they run into anymore.
So now it's just "kill 'em and be done w/ it"??? How are the daughters EVER to be helped/reimbursed/counseled for this wanton display of deadly violence - and it being THEIR DADDY too! - for having a pissed off cop? Just strike the Dad down like a rabid dog?
Oh cops get pissed off, don't EVER suggest otherwise - don't any of you watch Cops and how they tackle someone BIG TIME who has run from them? In fact, CA officers have been reprimanded and some busted for excessive force. How about when they tackled and beat the heck outta that guy where they were all just below a guard rail? I remember seeing that image played over and over and I don't even LIVE in CA!
Pacific _waters
5:48 am on Sunday, February 12, 2012
There was no immediate threat. This is another example of a law enforcement world out of control.
Connie Miller
10:20 pm on Monday, February 20, 2012
James, I am quite concerned that the daughters were taken to the station and their testimony was taken, My concern Is that the sheriff's office might have influenced their testimony. I wonder if any child advocate or legal representation (other than police) was avail
able to protect and support the girls.
Chris McLaughlin
6:25 pm on Friday, February 10, 2012
Is
there
dashboard
camera
video??
Where
is
it??
James
6:30 pm on Friday, February 10, 2012
On another note, it was dark the officer pulled up behind the truck that had tinted windows. so even if he put on spot light into back windows head rest would prevent him from seeing there were young kids in the back seat. So this Marine jumps out of the truck and walks away, at this time only one officer on scene still so his attention naturally would be to follow the guy walking from the truck he just pulled up on. Marine heads back to truck after 5 minutes that was facing toward the back of the school so when does this deputy see the kids they never got out of the truck. Lets say Marine takes off at this point . The Marine could only go foward one of the officers could have went all the way to the other exit. if he attempted to ram car Shoot away. if you look on google earth That Marine would have to drive a long way before he exited the school grounds but devils advocate they have split seconds to think so would they know he only had one way out of the school grounds?
James
6:43 pm on Friday, February 10, 2012
V. Duvall are you serious? you have to be or related to law enforcement to be so bias. Do you think for one second that if the Marine had a weapon they wouldnt have pasted all over the news how a Marine attempted to attack a police officer forcing the officer to shoot him? or if he said "you sons of bitchs i am going to kill you" they wouldnt hurry up and come to their own defense? Whatever the Marine was"saying" obviously is up for ones interpetation. Which is why i think there is a dash cam and possibly mic on officers. They dont want to say he said something he didnt when there is proof he didnt. If they say that camera's werent on or broken i am going to laugh my ass off. Since now there are multiple officers on scene at the time of shooting and neither cars turned on camera for a confrontation or both were broke.
James
7:03 pm on Friday, February 10, 2012
V.Duvall I appologize, not bias you have been defending both sides. but to think they wouldnt have let us know if there were a weapon is not realistic. I too hate to think that these guys just shot this guy with no good cause. I dont think 99% of police going around just shooting people, who wants to deal with these investigations. This is just so strange that a 15 year veteran would have made a poor decision like that? This whole case just dont add up.
Ms. Air Force
8:31 pm on Friday, February 10, 2012
I hope they have the dash cam... I really do!
V. Duvall
3:03 am on Saturday, February 11, 2012
THank you James for the apology. I think I said that "Susan" couldn't know unless she was there. THey just haven't told us yet. If he 'brandished' anything, it could have been a cell phone, an IPod or something else. After all it was 0dark30 and some think he was going for a run. We just don't know
Roy Rivenburg
8:01 am on Saturday, February 11, 2012
@V. Duvall: There was no brandishing of anything -- weapon, phone or Bible -- according to the deputy's statements to investigators. He fired into the car to prevent Sgt. Loggins from leaving with the girls.
V. Duvall
11:07 am on Saturday, February 11, 2012
Roy, I wasn't the one that said he was brandishing anything, I was commenting on what Susan said earlier. I was using her quotes.
Roy Rivenburg
11:20 am on Saturday, February 11, 2012
V. Duvall, I thought you were saying the Sheriff's Department "hadn't told us yet" if Sgt. Loggins was brandishing or reaching for something. In fact, the department has said he was doing neither. So, I wanted to clarify that was not a factor in the shooting.
V. Duvall
2:59 pm on Saturday, February 11, 2012
I see, Roy. My comments regarding that were formed prior to me reading that the OCSD said anything regarding him being armed along with what Susan said. It's hard to keep things in order when all of these comments are not in chronological order. My last comment regarding this was at 6:29 on the 10th and patch's comment I see was at 6:56 on the 10th. It's hard to keep up
Ms. Air Force
7:00 pm on Friday, February 10, 2012
Damn! So if the cop was concerned about the children why on earth did he shoot the driver through the driver side window?.. or do shoot (into the car) knowing that the kids were in the backseat? This still doesn't make sense.. seems like the cop is trying to get his lie together to make him look like the freakin' hero! At first he feared for his life and then the next day... He feared for the life of the kids.. what's next. Manny was selling drugs on school grounds so he had to stop him?! I mean really.. Law enforcement has let me down once again! This idiot cop can go home and hug his wife.. play with his kids.. tuck 'em in at night.. What does Manny family get?! What about his children? The idiot cops couldn't put up baracades or tack strips to impair the vehicle? Concerned for the kids my @$$...
This story stinks of lies and deception!
Margaret Mueller
7:54 pm on Friday, February 10, 2012
Its called training....over and over again training. That is why he is able to shoot into the window at an angle as not to harm the passengers in the backseat. Maybe you should stop watching so many cop shows on TV. What makes you think you know what this cop is feeling.....you have NO CLUE !!!!!
Alex Kays
8:18 pm on Friday, February 10, 2012
Mueller All this training and he doesn't know how to do anything he learned but to shoot an unarmed man. As i said in the other article. Get off your God Complex for cops. The worthless cop shot an unarmed man with his children in the car for no good reasons.
Escalation of Force, I guess your little cop buddy didn't learn that did he. I am so sick of hearing your run your mouth backing the cop. Admit he made a mistake. There was no reason to shoot Sgt Loggins. There are honestly 10 things he could have done before deeming appropriate to end a life, for the sake of all of us and what little dignity you have left just stop posting.
Margaret Mueller
12:12 am on Tuesday, February 21, 2012
ALEX KAYS - AS II have mentioned to you before.....I am not on any complex...God or not. You have your opinions....and I have my own. Dont tell me to stop posting on anything.....I will do as I please. You need to do a little more research before you start blabbing your mouth about things you dont know of.
Douglas Martin
7:07 pm on Friday, February 10, 2012
This is from the OCSD Blotter. It basically says that:
At 0441::26 OCSD Unit 476 pulled over a vehicle.
At 0441::52 - Thirty seconds later a MB (male black) "TOOK OFF ON FOOT THRU GATE"
At 0444::58 - Three minutes later Unit 476 says that the "want" (the reason for making contact) is for "HIT AND RUN AND CHILD ENDANGERMENT".
At 0446::55 - Unit 476 requests OCFD medics.
Five minutes is a LONG time for all this to go down (count it out: one-1000, two-1000, Three-1000, etc). Did the SO kill the Marine before or after he made the "child endangerment" claim? This story is full of loose ends.
2/7/2012 07:05:56 : pos5 : HOVDEBM] MOVING ALL UNITS TO Y-TAC-S2 [2/7/2012 06:14:21 : pos13 : SHINEFM] SC AFTER HRS SERVICE ADVSD [2/7/2012 05:28:18 : pos5 : SHINEFM] Unit : 4S70 REQ 6 RESERVES [02/07/2012 05:25:33 : pos16 : MCFADDENGC] PIO WILLBE ENR [2/7/2012 05:21:45 : pos5 : SHINEFM] Unit : 4A32 10-97 MISSION 10-1 AREA [2/7/2012 05:08:20 : pos5 : SHINEFM] Unit : 473 AND 476 EN RT SUB [2/7/2012 04:56:57 : pos5 : SHINEFM] Unit : 4S70 MEDICS 97 [2/7/2012 04:50:53 : pos5 : SHINEFM] Unit : 4A32 1 IC [2/7/2012 04:50:14 : pos5 : SHINEFM] 10-39 OCFA [2/7/2012 04:46:55 : pos5 : SHINEFM] Unit : 476 REQ OCFA [2/7/2012 04:44:58 : pos5 : SHINEFM] Unit : 476 WANT IS HIT AND RUN AND CHILD ENDANGERMENT [2/7/2012 04:41:52 : pos5 : SHINEFM] Unit : 476 1 MB TOOK OFF ON FOOT THRU GATE [2/7/2012 04:41:26 : pos5 : SHINEFM] Landmark Comment: 992J2 92672 AREA = 75 1ST TURN OFF INTO PLOT
James
7:51 pm on Friday, February 10, 2012
Amormino acknowledged that this version of events differed from an earlier account released by the Sheriff's Department, in which the deputy reportedly opened fire because he feared for his own life.
"The real threat was for the lives of the children," Amormino said Friday. In a case like this, "some information becomes immediately available and some takes longer to get because witnesses have to be interviwed," Ok so after other people are interviewed you remember you werent in fear of your life? I dont know how you get confused about if you killed someone to protect your own life or someone elses. and like Mr Martin reports with his time frame that was posted 5 minutes? thats all the negotiating you could do is 5 mins before you pull your weapon? It dont make sense a 15 year veteran on the police force should 1. know better, i dont know if it would had made a difference it wasnt a Marine would people have just let it slide? 2 have his own tactics from experience in dealing with distraught people on how to de escalade a situation. I am praying this officer was black otherwise people are going to pull the race card for sure. Thanks for that post Douglas Martin.
George
8:22 pm on Friday, February 10, 2012
Sounds like a job for anonymous... We are legion.
George
8:25 pm on Friday, February 10, 2012
We do not forgive.... We do not forget.... Http:WWW.anonops.org
Carrie h
8:26 pm on Friday, February 10, 2012
Okay so the guy drives off....okay follow him till he surrenders dont kill him!!!!
Margaret Mueller
12:14 am on Tuesday, February 21, 2012
ALEX KAYS - I have not been backed into a corner, nor have I gone away. Cops do plenty of things wrong...just not in this case.
Ms. Air Force
8:44 pm on Friday, February 10, 2012
Alex,
Manny was a friend of mine and this incident just seems all too bizzare. This whole story just isn't right and I truly hope that the truth comes out and this isn't just swept under the rug! Please keep the family in prayer because they will definitely need it.
Alex Kays
8:42 pm on Friday, February 10, 2012
Ms. Air Force, He was a great friend of mine as well. I was stationed with him in Hawaii and Camp Pendleton. I am doing the same i refuse to let this get swept under the rug. He deserves his justice.
George
8:46 pm on Friday, February 10, 2012
Anonymous strong.
If we can access the president of Syria's email.... Do you think we can access your silly ocsd evidence and emails? Silly police... Good at murder....bad @ computer. You will be exposed... We are legion... We do not forgive... We do not forget.
WB
9:35 pm on Friday, February 10, 2012
All to often some in Law enforcement choose to fire their weapons and claim self defense or on the pretense of protecting others. Is using a fire arm against an UNARMED civilian the best choice? I dont think so. Their were many other options available to the officer if he truly felt the girls or he were in danger. Based on the story presented and because the officer changed his story leads me to believe the officer was NOT justified in the shooting. Moreover, he is now making up stories to cover his butt. This is truly a tragic incident that shall affect all involved for a very long time. Those poor innocent young girls will now have to grow up without their HERO and be scared for life. I hope there will be justice and retribution for the family. But, using history as an indicator he will unfortunately get off scott free.
Justice4Zac
9:45 pm on Friday, February 10, 2012
There are any number of reasons that a person could have been unable to follow commands: intoxication, deafness, stroke, mental health issues, etc. The list of unarmed victims of police violence, almost always young men, mostly people of color, continues to grow daily: Manuel Loggins (Marine), Oscar Grant, Allen Kephart, Reggie Doucet, Jr., Doug Zerby, Zac Champommier, Erik Scott (West Point Grad-Army), DJ Henry, James Earl Rivera, Joey Pinasco, Christian Portillo, Ramarley Graham, Kelly Thomas, Caesar Cruz, Julian Collender, Ernest Duenez, Jr., Jose Guarena (Marine), Bubba Gutierrez, and so many more from decades past. Search these names. These were good people. The problem appears to be that the culture in law enforcement promotes a shoot first mentality and case law, like Graham v. Conner, allows enough wiggle room for the cops to get out killing for which they are responsible by claiming to have been in fear for their lives. Adding insult to injury, the cops are allowed to investigate themselves, an inherently biased arrangement that the public should be repulsed by.
George
9:52 pm on Friday, February 10, 2012
Watch for anonymous to release the name of the officer..
Family members
Social security #
All current and past addresses...
Known partners/associates
Past discipline measures
Employment history
Badge id
Education
Sexual orientation
past arrests with african americans
Etc....
Beverly
10:07 pm on Friday, February 10, 2012
Monday morning quarterbacks. None of you were there. My prayers are with both the family of the Marine and the police officer.
George
10:08 pm on Friday, February 10, 2012
Http://WWW.anonops.org
Chris McLaughlin
10:13 pm on Friday, February 10, 2012
Does anyone know if the daughters ever got out of the car?? If they had just driven through a gate and we're about to go on their normal morning walk, I'm sure they were awake. So if they felt threatened by their Dad, who had walked off away from the car, and they saw police officers there who could provide them safety from their Dad, why would they have stayed in the car?? (BTW, the OC Register article says that Amormino said the girls were screaming in the car, but Amormino wasn't there, either)
Maybe they didn't feel any danger from their Dad. Maybe there were cops outside the car with their guns drawn looking for their Dad, and staying in the car seemed like the safer option. It's hard to believe that you would think the girls were in danger (from their Dad) but then stayed in the car rather than seek police protection. Their knew Dad was a Marine. They knew he didn't have a gun. Why would they stay in the car if they felt threatened by him? That doesn't make any sense...
Chris McLaughlin
10:21 pm on Friday, February 10, 2012
I really hope they have some dashboard video and the timestamps match this log:
4:41:26 Landmark Comment: 992J2 92672 AREA = 75 1ST TURN OFF INTO PLOT
4:41:52 Unit : 476 1 MB TOOK OFF ON FOOT THRU GATE
4:44:58 Unit : 476 WANT IS HIT AND RUN AND CHILD ENDANGERMENT
4:46:55 Unit : 476 REQ OCFA
4:50:14 10-39 OCFA
4:50:53 Unit : 4A32 1 IC
4:56:57 Unit : 4S70 MEDICS 97
The Sheriff's said they were looking for him away from the car for about 5 minutes. 3 minutes in they called it in as child endangerment. At 5 minutes in they're calling for the ambulance. When were shots fired again? How long was he away from the car and they couldn't find him?? How many backup deputies showed up and when?? There's a reason they installed dashboard cameras. We don't want to have to rely on eyewitnesses and recollections.
Let's see the video!! Who pays for that video, anyway?? Who 'owns' the video footage? The People??
V. Duvall
2:53 am on Saturday, February 11, 2012
It would need to be subpoenaed.
George
11:14 pm on Friday, February 10, 2012
Anonymous will get that video if it exists....no reason it shouldn't... Along with all the other details
We do not forgive ... we do not forget ...
Http://WWW.anonops.org
Yana Pollard
11:29 pm on Friday, February 10, 2012
It is hard to wake up some days and not feel like the world is crumbling all around us. It is remarkable what we humans are capable of and how devastating one split decision can be. In times like these, it can be difficult not to feel alone and frustrated. But the human spirit has shown great resilience throughout history and when tragedy strikes, we often miraculously manage to join together, pick up the pieces, and push through immense challenges. It is because of this powerful strength that I ask anyone who knew Manny and would like to show their support for his family, anyone who knows what it is like to lose someone you love & respect, and anyone who has ever felt alone to please come out for a memorial service this coming Sunday (the 12th) at 8pm at the San Clemente Police Department. The address is: 100 Avenida Presidio. San Clemente. 92672. Your show of peaceful support would be greatly welcomed and appreciated, more than you could know.
Yana Pollard
11:38 pm on Friday, February 10, 2012
again...please, anyone who knew Manny and would like to show their support for his family, anyone who knows what it is like to lose someone you love & respect, and anyone who has ever felt alone, please come out for a memorial service this coming Sunday (the 12th) at 8pm at the San Clemente Police Department. The address is: 100 Avenida Presidio. San Clemente. 92672. Your show of peaceful support would be greatly welcomed and appreciated, more than you could know.
marte phillip
2:31 am on Saturday, February 11, 2012
May Manny rest in peace may his three daughters and the child his wife is carrying find calm in the midst of this terrible storm.
jake
7:46 am on Saturday, February 11, 2012
Margaret,
If I believed in conspiracy theories I would say you were put here to try and drum up support for the deputy. Of course I know that's not true. They may be saying that the cop feared for the girls safety now but he did in fact say earlier that " He was threatened " by Loggins. While the real reasons for him shooting Loggins are a mystery the fact remains that a 15 year veteran of the force should know better. There is no amount of training an officer can get that would allow him to predict that a bullet will not ricochet inside a vehicle.
jake
7:56 am on Saturday, February 11, 2012
The police are already starting to cover their own *@*@* by not defending it. Everything about Loggins has, so far, proven to be legit. From people who know him to people who worked with him. What everybody also knows is that 15 year veteran of the force shot a marine in the back..twice while he and his kids were in their car, he says first that he felt threatened then changes his story to fear for the kids and last but not least the secrecy behind the whole incident. Everyone knows that the military gets 24hrs before they can say anything but when it comes to local police if it was some crack dealer it would be all over the news that day. They needed time to get a story together that would place the blame on the deputy but in a way that made him out to be the "hero". Face it this cops is going to burn for this. The public will demand it.
JB
8:07 am on Saturday, February 11, 2012
It is utterly rediculous the biased anti-police statements being made by individuals who have little to no knowledge of the events that unfolded in this tragic event. I will admit that the police force should do a better job at organizing it's facts and statements before releasing any information, because now it opens the door for all the conspiracy theorists abound to make such ludicrous statements based solely on biased anti-establishment beliefs. No one knows what has unfolded at the scene except for a few adults, one of which is now dead, and a few traumatized children. It will be difficult and time consuming to ascertain the truth from this tragic event. Please stop assuming you know what happened and wait for the facts to be released. We have no idea what happened.
JB
8:12 am on Saturday, February 11, 2012
Manny could have been making verbal threats that he was going to go murder his children, or it is possible the police officer may have misconstrued the information exchange and acted improperly in using deadly force. We just don't know. People may vouch for Manny and the Police Officer in question saying they are both great family men, and would never do anything to harm his children, another individual, etc. That may be the case when they are in their right minds, but one would assume that either Manny or the Police Officer must have been in a different state of mind, whether chemically (knowingly or unknowingly drugged) or biologically induced (i.e. manic, psychosis, sleep deprivation, PTSD, etc) to behave in a manner so out of character.
Connie Miller
10:59 pm on Monday, February 20, 2012
JB, every individual who knew Manny asserts that he was stable, calm, reliable and above all respectful to all and meticulous about orders. That is their testimony, their personal experience with him. To speculate that he suddenly and inexplicably suffered some kind of psychotic breakdown or PTSD (he had never been deployed) sounds quite unlikely and suspiciously like a scenario concocted by the officer as a CYA. Who to believe? I believe the people who knew him and worked with him.
Elvis
8:22 am on Saturday, February 11, 2012
Yeah, no weapon a 3500 lb car couldn't possibly be a weapon, huh? The fact that the child was in the back proves the Marine had no regard for anybody's safety. If the Marine will gravely endanger his own daughter, do you really think he would take a second thought about taking out a bunch of people?
Police officers have a tough job that takes split second decisions. They don't decide whether or not somebody wants a bag or not. Lives hang in the balance. You want justice? Then support the decision to take potentially take a life to save many.
This I am sure was not and has not been easy for the deputy. He has to not only live with his decision, but listen to all of you people call him out. When you go through you day today and the toughest question you ask yourself is blue cheese or Italian. Think about how hard a life changing decision that is.
Justice4Zac
3:49 pm on Saturday, February 11, 2012
Your logic is faulty: First, the car-as-deadly weapon scenario is a fallacy. A person in harm's way (i.e., in the path of the car) does not have his/her position improved by killing the driver. In fact, since the weight of the shooting victim shifts to the feet, the car would likely become a dangerous run-away, potentially endangering the lives of any living occupants and any who may now be in its path,
As to supporting the "the decision to ...take a life to save many", that would allow any cop to kill anyone behind the wheel for what they "potentially" may do. We've all seen dangerous street crossings and have thought to ourselves "Man, they better get a stop light/sign here before someone gets hurt". The sign/light only gets put in when someone gets hurt.
Unfortunately, cops have been given the benefit of the doubt for so long that they know they can get away with murder. To change the status quo, we need to have independent investigation, by a truly independent entity (not some entity, like the Office of Independent Review, that only gives the appearance of being impartial).
For more in-depth understanding of the problem of police violence: http://youtu.be/hyrTZZKGP78
jake
8:35 am on Saturday, February 11, 2012
Yeah making a tough decision is indeed stressful. I guess that cop who shot that handcuffed kid in the back while he was on the ground would know. Perhaps that cop who shot that homeless man in Seattle. I'm not biased by any means I love cops. I have had the pleasure of dealing with great, respectful cops. I also know that some cops shouldn't be cops at all and as they get older and are with the force for a long time they get jaded. Not that this cop is THAT cop but when you have an outstanding record for one guy and a guy no one knows that can't get his story straight ...I don't know. It seems really cut and clear to most. Play politically correct if you must. I get it
Ms. Air Force
8:43 am on Saturday, February 11, 2012
Elvis..
Let's say you are correct in your theory.. Why would the deputy change his story?! First Sgt Loggins reached into his SUV and the deputy feared for his life.. NOW it's... he feared for the lives of the children which encouraged him to fire into the vehicle while they were in the backseat.. Which is it? The second excuse doesn't make sense either. Even though I wasn't there (none of us were) the 2 articles leaves sooooo many holes and it seems as though the cop was entirely wrong for this. We've seen it on the news before when a police task force was dispatched to subdue someone, baracades, tack strips... and other measures were used to end something without ending a life. The cop exhausted all options especially being a 15 year veteran. Initially I thought this was a rookie... but knowing that he wasn't just makes it even harder to digest! But the beauty (and the heartbreaking) of all this is that there are 2 witnesses that can tell everything that they saw. The truth will come out! The children in the car ages 9 and 14, will tell it all! They aren't babies... They are old enough to give an accurate account of what happened.. A Bitersweet moment... I may get a lot of flack for my next sentence.. But before you respond to this.. Know that Manny was friend of mine and I want but justice... I'm glad there are witnesses because if it wasn't, the cop could essentially get away with MURDER!
Ronald Douglas Kennedy
8:47 am on Saturday, February 11, 2012
Air Force. "So if the cop was concerned about the children"Good.-- and later-- Chris."The Sheriff's said they were looking for him away from the car for about 5 minutes. 3 minutes in they called it in as child endangerment. At 5 minutes in they're calling for the ambulance"
If Manny did run from the Car would not the Sheriff first Clear the Car First? On seeing the Children , you would think the Sheriff would automatically, place the Children in his patrol police car for their "Protective Custody," Safety First? Then run the licence Plate on Manny's Car, to see who they wear dealing with? Be fore running off in the dark Bang Bang .
Was toxicology tests also taken of the Sheriff, in this Civilian shootings? With out Law and Order we all will slip in to Anarchy. And our Finest are holding the line for America. And our highest respect goes to both groups. So what really Happened hear and Why? Ronald Douglas Kennedy
Ms. Air Force
8:48 am on Saturday, February 11, 2012
Ronald,
Were you addressing something to me?!
WhyIsThierLifeWorthMore
8:48 am on Saturday, February 11, 2012
Why are police officers taught that their own lives are more valuable than the lives of ordinary citizens?
Why do police officers have the right to kill citizens over a PERCEIVED threat?
These are the questions I believe we should be asking ourselves.
A police officer's actions should be held to a higher standard than what is allowed now. They have the power to end our lives in the name of law and order.
My condolences to those who lost and are suffering.
Jon Dough
8:50 am on Saturday, February 11, 2012
The daughters in the back seat, and the squad car video will inevitably be the key to unlocking what really happened in this trajic incident. We will all have to wait until that information is released. Until then speculation will only further the fuel in this already firey incident. I urge people not to predispose what happened until the facts come out. They will come out the Military looks out for themselves, just as the police department do. If there was injustice it will be brought to light.
Ronald Douglas Kennedy
8:53 am on Saturday, February 11, 2012
Air Force --Agreeing and adding a thought --
Ms. Air Force
8:55 am on Saturday, February 11, 2012
ah.. I see.. thanks!
enea ostrich
8:57 am on Saturday, February 11, 2012
To me this is a nightmare and I was supremely surprised at the wife's mini interview on the news last night. She seemed in shock, so calm, considering this event changed her life forever. What I find is that the shock will subside and she and her girls will get the help and support they need to get through this. It'll be tough with the media circus, of course. As for the investigation into the deputy who shot the Marine, isn't there a jurisdiction issue if the man who was shot is an "active duty" officer? In other words, doesn't NCIS get involved here as well? Just a question...
Ms. Air Force
9:12 am on Saturday, February 11, 2012
I don't know if NCIS will investigate because it was done off base.. As for the wife.. she's calm perhaps because she is still in shock and it hasn't really hit her yet. Or someone deeply rooted in faith process things a little differently then those who are not. God Bless Phoebe and the girls!
Ms. Air Force
8:59 am on Saturday, February 11, 2012
I still can't understand why I haven't heard this story on CNN or any other nat'l news source. Being that there are so many holes and changes in the story, I thought by now, they would have broadcasted something! Had this story gone the other way.. Marine kills Deputy in CA, then this would have been headlined across the nation.
Josiah
9:01 am on Saturday, February 11, 2012
Elvis,
Shut the f*@#k up. You didn't know this marine, this man, this brother in bed arms, this father to many!!! How dare you assume for the brief second or minute that Sgt Loggins would endanger the life of his family! This was a God fearing family oriented man! He loved people and wanted to make a change in the world by helping others where he could. So don't even speak down on him in that manner. I do believe all things work according to Gods holy will and plans and i know the just will prevail. And Elvis it is not your beloved deupty sherrif!
Laurie
9:05 am on Saturday, February 11, 2012
The unfortunate part of this is that those 2 children saw their father shot & killed right in front of their eyes!! Just think how those children are feeling now!!! This memory will be with them for the rest of their lives!
Imagine someone being shot & killed in front of you, let alone your own father... Blood everywhere!!! How disgusting!!
My heart goes out to those children... God bless!
enea ostrich
9:09 am on Saturday, February 11, 2012
CNN is a very biased station, in my opinion. It was proven during the wars in Iraq. There would be one set of news we would hear here, and something completely different on the BBC. So, let's be glad that we don't have CNN involved. As much as I like Terry Moran (the way he delivers his news freely, with no holds barred), I feel that the station he works for wants to glorify things, make them appear better or worse than they really are. Let's keep this subject here in California, where it belongs, especially in the OC, where the tragedy took place.
Chris McLaughlin
9:14 am on Saturday, February 11, 2012
I'm a little tired of the standard police attitude, like from the end of the movie Training Day, that they're the cops, and we just live here. There's no reason to delay releasing any evidence (like the dashboard video, any audio from the scene or radio traffic/calls), other than to protect the deputies. The normal concept of preserving evidence for trial is a little skewed, since who would normally be the Accused is already Deceased. There's not going to be a trial for the victim. The only reason to hold back the dashboard video is to save it for the deputy's trial.
A fact that I know will be important is when exactly did the deputy, or deputies, realize there were kids in the car? As the car pulled in, or when they were out looking for the driver, or just when the driver came back to the car?? It was called in as child endangerment 3 minutes after the initial call. Even without the dashboard video, build the timeline from there...
enea ostrich
9:15 am on Saturday, February 11, 2012
One comment on the shooting in the car I too have to bring up because I am a mom of two...it disgusts me to think that a father is shot in his own car WITH the kids present. A split second to shoot the guy instead of a taser gun on him BEFORE he even got into the car (unless he was running to the car and the officer can't catch him?) is something I hope is defined thoroughly in this investigation... Justice is not sweet unless this part is proven as assumed here.
Chris McLaughlin
9:36 am on Saturday, February 11, 2012
I do realize that the police on scene know nothing about the driver's background, that he was a Marine or a Christian family man, and have to go on just what they see before them, all the while making spilt-second decisions that will have a lifetime of consequences. I get that.
Even taking the deputy's perspective, I have to believe he was assuming the worse, showing excessive force and not presuming innocence. Do you think he even thought for an instant that maybe it was just a guy taking his kids to go workout, and had driven through a gate that's never locked?? If I did that, I would be pretty pissed about having to get my car fixed, about how much grief my wife is going to give me and what my new car insurance premium was going to go up to, and wouldn't be thinking about getting arrested or questioned by police.
Did the deputy assume the driver was drunk, or on drugs, or had abducted the kids or something?? That's where the prejudice and racism starts to creep in. Would the same assumptions have been made if the victim wasn't Black? Would a Black cop have given the victim more benefit of the doubt? (I'm guessing the cop is white, which hasn't been released by police.)
Ms. Air Force
10:01 am on Saturday, February 11, 2012
The dash cam apparently was working.. Why hasn't the footage been released to the public..Normally, it would have been released by now..
http://abclocal.go.com/kabc/story?section=news/local/orange_county&id=8539913
Chris McLaughlin
11:35 am on Saturday, February 11, 2012
Thanks for the link, Airman! This is good news, that they have the video footage, and hopefully it's played in open court someday soon. I think it's very telling that the official spokesman is going on record that he's 'not defending, just explaining'. It's like he's relaying the deputy's statements, knowing that they're suspect, and not wanting anyone to think that he actually believes them, so it doesn't impugn his credibility as a spokesman for future incidents. I wonder if he's seen the video personally, or just talked to someone who's seen it, and they've given him the slow head-shake while looking down with a furrowed brow, the universal sign for: "It doesn't look good for our guys..."
It's less good news that the former long-time OC Sheriff is currently serving time in Federal prison for witness-tampering:
http://articles.latimes.com/2011/jan/26/local/la-me-carona-prison-20110126
It's not like he was the only bad apple at the very top who thought the public only needs to know what the cops want us to know. I hope there's someone making copies of that tape, not to leak early, but just in case the official tape that gets played in court has been 'modified'.
One lesson the police could take away from this tragedy is that everything is being recorded and stored forever these days, so don't bother trying to lie about anything on duty, ever.
V. Duvall
11:36 am on Saturday, February 11, 2012
Ms. Air Force, how do you know that the PVS was working? And no, normally it wouldn't have been released by now. Please don't speak of things you seem to know nothing about.
Panglonymous
11:51 am on Saturday, February 11, 2012
ABC7 correspondent (from Ms. AF link):
"...the entire incident [was] caught on the patrol car's dash camera..."
Is that even possible, given the limitations of a fixed camera without an operator and the dynamic nature of the event?
Chris McLaughlin
12:17 pm on Saturday, February 11, 2012
Pan, I took it as more that the camera was running the whole time, and the vantage point was from the patrol car behind the victim's SUV, not that someone was walking around with the camera and getting all angles and everything. I'm hoping there's audio, too, because what they're saying about what the victim and the kids were saying, as well as the sets of verbal commands from the deputy, are going to be very significant.
Panglonymous
12:49 pm on Saturday, February 11, 2012
Chris, the video may be quite limited in what it confirms. Odds that it will prove something *definitively* are slim, imo.
On the other hand, I wonder if officers may 'play to the camera' to the extent that it's possible, i.e., delay action until it is within the camera frame. People have questioned why the victim wasn't confronted before he had gotten back into his vehicle. Could this be a factor?
Panglonymous
2:00 pm on Saturday, February 11, 2012
This comment (regarding a highly controversial police shooting in LB about a year ago) might be useful to concerned citizens as the investigation goes forward. A veteran LB law enforcement officer points out:
"Given that the Chief is constrained by law from releasing some information in cases like these and given that there is still a civil suit and a related private investigation in progress, yes, I think he has been as transparent as he could possibly be to date.
Public disclosure of all statements related to such investigations is not always either proper or lawful. This does not mean that there is no oversight. THOSE THE VOTERS HAVE ELECTED TO REPRESENT THEM HAVE FULL ACCESS TO THE RESULTS OF THESE INVESTIGATIONS AND ALL OF THE STATEMENTS CONTAINED THEREIN. [my emphasis]
This is yet one more reason why we (as a community) should try to make good decisions about the people we elect to represent us in government."
http://belmontshore.patch.com/articles/da-rules-zerby-shooting-justified#comment_1941179
Panglonymous
4:02 pm on Saturday, February 11, 2012
More background info that might be useful:
Long Beach Should Name Police Involved In Shootings, Court Rules
Ruling upholds a Superior Court order that the city must release the names in response to a public records request from the Los Angeles Times
2/8/12
http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-officer-names-20120208,0,6553577.story
Panglonymous
9:42 am on Sunday, February 12, 2012
How much info about a registered owner does a license plate check return? Do linked databases come into play these days?
Another thing to consider when doping this out is that the officers on scene are communicating with each other and command - and that radio interplay is recorded (as I understand it.)
Panglonymous
3:28 pm on Monday, February 13, 2012
Interesting background on the American coroner system from the PBS documentarians at Frontline:
Post Mortem - Death Investigation in America [video 2/11]
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/post-mortem/
Susie Hutto
11:24 am on Saturday, February 11, 2012
I've been following up on the sad death of Sgt. loggins and the comments people have made. All i can say is things don't add up and something smells rotten inrk. If that cop shot Manny cuz he feared for the lives of the two girls then why on earth did he shoot in the car when a bullet could have easily ricocheted and struck one or both the girls? Seems to me better judgment should have been used. Just sayin...
Ms. Air Force
1:43 pm on Saturday, February 11, 2012
Susie,
That's what make the story even more bizzare. And I'm not sure if you read the initial article.. but the cop went from fearing for his own life... (3 days later) fearing for the life of the kids.. SMH...
Yana Pollard
11:57 am on Saturday, February 11, 2012
again... anyone who knew Manny and would like to show their support for his family, anyone who knows what it is like to lose someone you love & respect, and anyone who has ever felt alone, please come out for a *candlelight vigil* this coming Sunday (the 12th) at 8pm at the San Clemente Police Department. The address is: 100 Avenida Presidio. San Clemente. 92672. Your show of peaceful support would be greatly welcomed and appreciated, more than you could know.
James
12:42 pm on Saturday, February 11, 2012
FYI for all curious NCIS is investigating.
Chris McLaughlin
1:26 pm on Saturday, February 11, 2012
They better be. Amormino may refer to the victim as Mr. Loggins, but to HQMC, he's Sgt. Loggins, USMC. The Police should at least extend that respect to the fallen.
Roy Rivenburg
3:42 pm on Saturday, February 11, 2012
NCIS is assisting Orange County law enforcement in the investigation. But Orange County is the lead agency, according to NCIS public affairs.
James
12:48 pm on Saturday, February 11, 2012
what I do not see on the police report timestamp, is the police officer supposably calling for backup or any other deputy radioing in that they are in route. they said there were other officers surrounding the field
Chris McLaughlin
1:39 pm on Saturday, February 11, 2012
I think this Blotter entry, 3 minutes into it, is the officer calling for backup for a child endangerment case:
4:44:58 Unit : 476 WANT IS HIT AND RUN AND CHILD ENDANGERMENT
To me, this doesn't line up with the story about looking for the victim around the field for almost 5 minutes, and later shooting him as he's driving away, in order to protect the children.
I've never been a cop, but I wonder what the manual says about staying with the endangered children vs. pursuing the suspect in the dark alone (and leaving the endangered children unprotected). I bet it says to wait for backup and don't pursue the suspect alone, or don't leave endangered children alone to do so. I doubt deadly force is authorized in this type of case, when someone has no gun or knife in hand (or it shouldn't be), even if they aren't obeying commands. Non-lethal force, probably. Conservative containment of the situation, probably, but shooting someone without a gun, when driving away, to protect the other people in the car?? That can't be authorized procedure, or we really have morphed into a 'Police State'.
James
12:55 pm on Saturday, February 11, 2012
they claim they ordered him to come back from the field, but they could not see hiim so did not see when he came back towards the vehicle. so like someone else already said the police did not take endangered children out of the truck when they have a chance
Rob
12:56 pm on Saturday, February 11, 2012
Baased on nothing more than a brief interation with the suspect, the cop thought it "seemed dangerous" to let him drive away. So, the cop shot him dead. That's the justification for taking this man's life? Seriously?
Chris McLaughlin
1:23 pm on Saturday, February 11, 2012
Yes, and hard to believe if you have any faith in justice and reasonable restraint from the Police.
It is actually the second official, and current, justification. The first official one was that the deputy feared for his life, but I bet the evidence made that claim entirely preposterous. The Police Blotter says it was called in as a Child Endangerment three minutes after the original call for a traffic stop. I wish I had checked the Police Blotter earlier, to see if it originally said that, or if it had been modified at all.
It doesn't add up. The Police have a lot of explaining to do. Not to me, I'm just a citizen, but to the County DA, NCIS, and probably the Feds, what with the former Sheriff in Federal prison on witness tampering and all the other allegations that weren't proven of Mike Carona.
Ms. Air Force
1:41 pm on Saturday, February 11, 2012
Rob it would appear that's all the justification you need. Oh and the kids were in danger so.. firing INSIDE of the vehicle makes perfect sense too. This whole story is wild!
Douglas Martin
1:07 pm on Saturday, February 11, 2012
http://www.ncis.navy.mil/ContactUs/Pages/ReportaCrime.aspx
PhilM
1:12 pm on Saturday, February 11, 2012
My gut fee seems to be that the following is what happened:
The cop was alseep. The marine pulled into the lot, hit the gate, got out, went to see what he'd hit and the damage to the Yukon. Cop hears crash and wakes up. He drives over to investigate, sees a black man coming out of the field and returning to his car. He tells him to stop. Maybe the marine doesn’t know he’s a cop or just doesn’t doesn’t listen, gets in the car to drive away and groggy cop shoots him. I’m betting the marine was shot before the cop claimed he was stopping him for hit and run and child endangerment.
Were lights and siren used to alert Sgt. Loggins? OCSD deputies can endanger other lives in apprehending a statutory "criminal"? This deputy needs to be tried for manslaughter under color of authority.
Nancy
1:24 pm on Saturday, February 11, 2012
Phil, I wouldn't be surprised if much of your conjecture is close to the truth. If I was out in the pre-dawn hours with my 2 kids in the car and suddenly heard someone shouting something I couldn't quite make out, I would try to get out of there, too. My first reaction would be that somebody spooky was trying to harass me (since I know I'm not a "lawbreaker") It goes both ways that the suspect may have been difficult to see and it perhaps the law enforcement officer was not clearly identified as such (if there were no lights)
Ms. Air Force
1:36 pm on Saturday, February 11, 2012
Phil,
I was thinking that the lights weren't on.. Everyone knows that when you see flashing lights this means stop and cooperate. He could have thought it was another runner OR he could have had on his earbuds and couldn't hear the commands. After all, it was pretty dark outside.He could have honestly NOT heard anything. So it kinda raises a few eyebrows doesn't it?! I hope the conduct an honest investigation.
James
1:19 pm on Saturday, February 11, 2012
? Douglas what is that for? They are investing this case, I have confirmed it. but just like the police they are not going to be able to disclose anything until investigation is complete.
Ms. Air Force
1:33 pm on Saturday, February 11, 2012
Police Capt V. Duvall,
How about you take a look at the link I posted that says the dash cam was working and then reply. And seeming that you know all about procedures and media.. I take it that YOU know that the footage wouldn't have been released by now.. How many times have you tuned to CNN and watch dash cam footage about a suspect doing something illegal? Don't respond to any of my post until YOU have all of your facts together.. Otherwise you will indeed look like a ##$%@^$#@)! I was told by the Patch to watch my language so I'm sure you can figure out what I'm saying.. No need to respond.. you'll only appear to be desperate to prove your point! Semper Fi!
V. Duvall
7:17 pm on Saturday, February 11, 2012
Air force, You don't have to be rude, I haven't been rude to you. Maybe you just don't understand what you read. I'm glad to see that the PVS was working. Period. All I was trying to say much, much earlier was that the camera may not have been on, and at the time I first said that I don't think it had been told either way. So, OK it was on and that's good thing however it probably won't be the teller of much. I hope it is, but as you probably know it is in a fixed position and may not show much. Hopefully the audio was working and tells us a lot more. Now about me, I am a Ms. too.... I know many, many Marines most of them are retired from the Corps. One of my dearest friends was a USMC sniper in Viet Nam. Unfortunately he died while on USMC business in Colorado 27 years ago so get off your high horse. I never said anything rude or demeaning to you. By the way CNN is too liberal for me and I do have my facts together.
Ms. Air Force
1:43 pm on Saturday, February 11, 2012
At Chris.. No problem about the link.. Hopefully it's tamper proof.. And I'm hoping that it can shed some light as to what took place.
Chris McLaughlin
1:54 pm on Saturday, February 11, 2012
Kind of random/off-topic, but something to think about:
Why was the gate locked? Who locked it?? Not that they have any culpability, but if it wasn't locked/closed, Loggins wouldn't have driven through it, and the cop probably wouldn't have stopped him for speeding. Even if he did, it would have been with the kids and him getting out of the car to go walk the track, and not with damage to the car and the suspicion of reckless disregard for property/safety. How different things would be right now if that gate hadn't been locked...
Ms. Air Force
2:30 pm on Saturday, February 11, 2012
Chris,
it opens a new set of theories.. I wonder if the cop is thinking about his actions or is he just enjoying his paid "admin" leave? Do you think that the reason why the police department hadn't released the name of the deputy is because of fear of retaliation? I know Manny wouldn't want that!
Chris McLaughlin
2:50 pm on Saturday, February 11, 2012
I don't think locking the gate was intentional/related to this event on purpose, but I was just rolling the timeline backward and looking at what could have prevented this tragedy.
Another thing that seems kind of off is the report that Manny would often take his daughters there in the morning, and the deputy was in his car writing reports, but seemed unaware that someone would pull in that early to the parking lot and be there under legitimate circumstances. Was the deputy sitting where he was for the first time? Was it not his usual spot to focus and catch up on paperwork??
Someone earlier had said something about there was a bomb threat at the school the day before, so maybe the gate was locked on purpose for extra physical security of the school, and the deputy was there for that reason, in which case whoever made that bomb threat should feel somewhat responsible Manny's death.
As far as not identifying the deputy involved, that's probably standard procedure, and a good idea. Manny wouldn't want any more violence over this, and I trust all of his supporters/mourners will keep that in mind and stay civil.
Chauncey Davis
2:04 pm on Saturday, February 11, 2012
Everyone on here has something to say but do you really think he would harm those kids??? HELL NO he loved those girls and everywhere he went those girls were right there! I have known Manny since September 2003 and he was one of my first leaders and I have stayed in contact with him. He loved to work out because we would go morning, afternoon, and evening after work. Manny didn't drink nor smoke and he was by far one of the healtiest people I have known. Police are DIRTY and I don't care who has a problem with me saying this. I have family and freinds in that area and have known three different incidents where the cops out there have shot and killed people for no reason. So don't give me that the police job is difficult and they have to make decisions! We Marines have to make decisions to and we know that was some BS!!!!!!!! I don't care how well you are trained in shooting you never fire at and unarmed person no matter what!!!! So ELVIS and MARGARET MUELLER go sit on it because what's wrong is wrong and those girls were of no harm.
Chris McLaughlin
2:36 pm on Saturday, February 11, 2012
Hi Chauncey, I don't think the official story adds up, either, but in fairness to the cops who work all night while we're sleeping, they don't know everyone in their patrol area's community, and most likely had no prior knowledge of how great a man and father Manny was. The deputy on scene probably only knew him as someone who drove through a locked gate at 4:40 a.m., and the rest is under debate/yet to be disclosed, as far as was he ignoring commands from the deputy, and whether he had reason to (like he couldn't hear him for some reason or the deputy didn't properly identify himself/was sneaking around the vehicle hoping to surprise him, or just trying to be stealthy at that hour and not wake up the neighborhood unnecessarily).
It's doubly-tragic that a man's individual character and reputation aren't immediately evident at crisis moments like this, but their skin color and associated stereotypes are certainly carried everywhere, all the time.
Alex Kays
2:50 pm on Saturday, February 11, 2012
Chris i can see what your saying, but what was the point of shooting the man. It was already confirmed he had no weapon no Ipod I phone or nothign that would look remotely like a gun.
I have stated it 10000's of times. Escalation of Force and Rules of Engagement. I know as Marines we learn this and would hope to GOD Police would learn them. I am 100% sure no matter where you look in either policy it states its ok to shoot an unarmed man.
As many have stated before, unless their blotter is incorrect the Officer had between 3-5 mins to pull those children to safety. If there was back up there why couldn't he be boxed in, why could a taser be used, why couldn't the vehicle been disabled, There are literally 10's of 100's of thing that could have been done instead of shooting this man.
Chris McLaughlin
3:55 pm on Saturday, February 11, 2012
Hi Alex,
I think this case hinges on whether the victim truly was being uncooperative and why. Trying to take the Police's side for a second, if Sgt. Loggins was really ignoring the deputy, or worse, shouting stuff that could be taken wrong and mistaken for violent intent/outright total disregard for authority, than that does sort of change everything. I can't imagine anything he could have said that would justify actually shooting him as he's driving away, but I do hope the video/audio evidence and testimony from the daughters sheds some light on all of this senselessness.
I do know one thing, that more than anything else, the Police do not deal well with having their authority disrespected. Think about the Prof. Gates incident at Harvard, that got him arrested and ended up with the Beer Summit with The President. The fact that he wouldn't identify himself, and wasn't cooperating, overruled all logic from a larger perspective of an old man obviously not being a burgular robbing a house at Harvard.
If you start from not knowing the man, and seeing him drive through a gate and blow you off when you say you're the Police, with red and white lights flashing, then drive away from the scene shouting disturbing things at the Police with scared kids in the back (this is assuming the official story is mostly accurate, which I'm not assuming), then you have to at least see where the deputy was coming from, impossible as it may seem from your prior knowledge of the victim.
Nancy
2:11 pm on Saturday, February 11, 2012
I am becoming increasingly sorry for Chauncy, Alex, Ms. Air Force, and others who lost their friend and mentor. I HATE that this happened in San Clemente!
Yes, where is mouthy Margaret today? Bemoaning the fact that the general public has the audacity to question a strange shooting with her former pals in Cypress, where she used to work as a dispatcher?
Ms. Air Force
2:24 pm on Saturday, February 11, 2012
Thank you Nancy!
Ms. Air Force
2:28 pm on Saturday, February 11, 2012
Margaret is an adult? I thought she was teenager saying stuff just to stir up emotions. Man.. Knowing she is an "adult" makes it even worse!
Alex Kays
2:42 pm on Saturday, February 11, 2012
I'd love to have Margaret finally reply to one of my messages. She is a coward, once you push back she balls up and hides in the corner.
Margaret Mueller
11:03 am on Tuesday, February 21, 2012
NANCY.......Why did you feel the need to hunt me down and go to the trouble of finding out my past/present employers? I have not done ANYTHING like that to anyone else on here that has an opinion. I have the right to post my thoughts just as you all do. I didnt hunt any of you down?
Nancy
11:42 am on Tuesday, February 21, 2012
Margaret, you were almost single-handedly rushing to the side of law enforcement with such vehemence (even the moderator had to ask you to chill regarding name calling), that I was curious if you worked in law enforcement. No other reason could explain your desperate-sounding posts. All I found was where you USED to work several years ago. And somebody else said you used to work at a different location, so who knows? But it does appear that sometime in the past, you worked in conjunction with sheriffs. So that explains your angle and satisfied my curiosity. At no point have I ever said where you live, or where (or even if) you are employed now. I do not know those details and I don't need to know them anymore, either. I would suggest, however, (given the response to your often inflammatory posts) that you edit your profile so that people can't google your full name.
David
3:12 pm on Saturday, February 11, 2012
One of the perks of being a pig, a license to Kill First, Ask Questions Later.
It was an honest mistake, and I'm sure he's sorry. He'll apologize.
Guess the children won't be in any danger, now that they have to live the remainder of their lives with the memory of watching their father get shot and killed.
Before someone says that not all pigs are a-holes, you're probably right. Just most of them. I hope one of them doesn't shoot or tase me because of this post.
James
3:19 pm on Saturday, February 11, 2012
I am actually glad Margaret is NOT commenting. She made me stick to my stomach. Yeah we all don't know the "facts" this is true and hey maybe Sgt Loggins DID loose his mind and was threatening causing the police to shoot him. Buuuut if he did why all the story changing and not just posting the dash cam to shut everyone up? As bad as it sounds, I almost wish Sgt Loggins did for some reason go crazy so at least he died for somewhat of a reason. Right now it just looks like it was a poor decision with nasty poor cover ups and his daughters have to pay the worst for this mistake.
Cindy Callahan-Farnum
6:59 pm on Saturday, February 11, 2012
I'm with you, James. Her comments have been seriously disturbing and made me seriously furious. I was starting to think she was one of those sick people who says horrible things, regardless of who they hurt, to just make people upset and escalate the situation. When I found out that she works/worked for the Whittier police department, it makes her comments even more upsetting to me.
David
3:21 pm on Saturday, February 11, 2012
I guess when I first read the story, I missed the part about the gentleman being black. That explains everything, especially in South Orange County. Unfortunately it's usually tough to prove that the pig is also a racist, but I'm sure if the guy had been white, the pig would have given him a bit more benefit of doubt.
The pig probably had not had his donut and coffee yet, so he wasn't thinking straight. Get that guy an old fashioned, he deserves it. All in a day's work for OC's finest.
Yana Pollard
3:29 pm on Saturday, February 11, 2012
ATTENTION: Because of family wishes, we would like to reschedule the candlelight vigil originally set for sunday evening at 8pm. We are sorry for the inconveniance but we will keep you posted on the specific details of the new vigil time and venue as soon as possible. Thank you for all your support.
James
3:31 pm on Saturday, February 11, 2012
is there video of the wifes interview online?
Roy Rivenburg
3:44 pm on Saturday, February 11, 2012
I don't believe Sgt. Loggins' wife has been interviewed. I think an earlier commenter mistook a TV news interview with one of Sgt. Loggins' nursing classmates for his wife.
Chris McLaughlin
3:39 pm on Saturday, February 11, 2012
I couldn't find anything about a recent bomb threat at SCHS, just the one from last September, but there is this very informative YouTube posted on the OCSD's own blog:
http://youtu.be/-G1ApUEXcbo
It's a 17-minute video, produced by the State of Oregon, but goes into the Hollywood myths and assumptions about Officer Involved Shootings, and at least half of the myths apply to this case. I'm not sure how much California State and OC law differs from Oregon, but I certainly like the idea of any other agency besides OCSD taking the lead in investigating tragedies like this. CHP or San Diego County Sheriffs would be a much better choice in gathering everyone together to hash it out as quickly as possible, without the taint of everything being practically in-house between OCSD and the County DA. We need to remove all stain of corruption when it comes to investigating something this blatantly suspect in terms of use of excessive force.
I'm going to try to let this go for the weekend and let those in charge do their jobs, but I do wish this would get picked up by a larger media outlet, to keep the pressure up and Margaret Muellers of the world from thinking they'll be any possibility of a white-wash or cover-up.
V. Duvall
7:29 pm on Saturday, February 11, 2012
Chris, I like the idea of a separate agency doing an investigation. I would like to see the NCIS do a parallel investigation. I'm not sure but I think they have jurisdiction when a Marine is involved but that may differ since it is an officer involved. The State Police (CHP) or FBI could do it if certain criteria are met. It may end up that way.
Justice4Zac
3:52 pm on Saturday, February 11, 2012
Two additional sources for understanding the problem of police violence:
http://youtu.be/hyrTZZKGP78
https://www.facebook.com/pages/United-Citizens-Against-Police-Violence/147770871972810
James
3:58 pm on Saturday, February 11, 2012
Chris good eye! I was the one who commented about bomb threat, i didnt notice the 2011. Was just by chance it was close to the same date a year later.
Nancy
4:55 pm on Saturday, February 11, 2012
When some posters here refer to police as "pigs" it makes them no better than Margaret. I am sure that the officer who killed Loggins is probably in a lot of pain right now. Taking a life (even if warranted) has to take a toll on anybody who is not a sociopath. And as more information about the character and values of the dead family man becomes known, it must be close to unbearable for the officer. Regardless, the truth must be uncovered.
David
7:31 am on Sunday, February 12, 2012
Great, he's in a lot of pain. When I drive fast, and get a ticket, that's a mistake. I guess he should have thought about it before he fired his weapon, most likely a "Shoot To Kill" shot, which they are probably trained to use when their life is at risk.
I guess we should just let any criminal who uses a weapon, and mistakenly kills someone, have the benefit of the doubt. After all, they probably feel bad.
If you carry a weapon, and have the rights and privileges of a police officer, you should have a much higher standard. I could care less how the officer feels, think how the wife, 3 children, and 1 unborn child, will feel for the rest of their lives. They're the ones who should be supported. "To Serve & Protect" has got to be the biggest lie ever told.
Judith Smalley
5:02 pm on Saturday, February 11, 2012
What is a father doing keeping or having his children out at such a terrible hour? Why was he in the school parking lot? There is no reason to drive into a school parking lot. Judith Smalley
Nancy
5:38 pm on Saturday, February 11, 2012
Judith, guess you've just gotten wind of this story, right? Otherwise you would know that: 1) it is the habit and routine of this family to do a pre-work, pre-school walk and Bible talk 2) the school track is the ideal location (others on the base say it is not safe to do a pre-dawn walk on base).
Chris McLaughlin
5:42 pm on Saturday, February 11, 2012
Judith, or should I call you Margaret,
FYI, anyone can click on your name and see that you joined Patch today, and that your one and only Comment is to hate on the memory of a dead man you've never met, who was fatally shot in front of his kids, by Police.
BTW, what is so terrible about 4:40 a.m.?? Some people work for a living, and the only time they can spend with their family and exercise together is that early. Is it supposed to be dangerous out at that hour? Are you supposed to be worried about getting killed by a traffic cop??
Margaret Mueller
12:32 am on Tuesday, February 21, 2012
So NANCY - Just why is it that in your comment you say "it is not safe to do a pre-dawn walk on base".............?
Nancy
9:55 am on Tuesday, February 21, 2012
Margaret--I don't have first hand knowledge of that. But I remember reading that on some other blog from someone who lives on base. Perhaps it is because there isn't an off-street place to walk, talk, and read in near darkness and there would be the risk of oncoming traffic.
Jane Doe
5:20 pm on Saturday, February 11, 2012
The closed gate is a big factor in this. Since the Marine father went there regularly, he may have thought the gate was unlocked. The police blotter says he went thru gate ON FOOT. ( does not say he crashed thru it with vehicle). Says wanted for a hit and run. What did he hit? Another car? A human? Also, the news articles keep repeating he drove in speeding and rammed the gate. The only witness that could be saying that was THE COP THAT KILLED HIM. Also, if the cop was in his car doing paperwork, the light would have been on in his cab. It would take some time to adjust to the dark, so his perception would be off. And if I understand correctly where this vehicle was at, there is NO OTHER EXIT, cop car behind his, and if the cop car was behind him with headlights on the Marine father would not be able to see toward the squad car. Where did the girls go? Did they run for their lives??? There were bloodhounds searching at the school during zero period.
Chris McLaughlin
5:51 pm on Saturday, February 11, 2012
I think the Police Blotter refers to the victim getting out of his car and going through another fence to the track/athletic fields on the school grounds, but the hit-and-run refers to driving through a locked gate with his Yukon to get into the parking lot, before getting out of the car and going to the track on foot. They say they couldn't find him for up to 5 minutes while in the fields (through the gate on foot), but then he came back to his car, wouldn't listen to verbal commands from the deputy, then started to drive off when shot. <- that's basically the Police's official story they've released so far. Testimony from the daughters and evidence will have more info, but we'll probably have to wait for that, you know, for legal reasons...
James
6:09 pm on Saturday, February 11, 2012
Also there was another exit, but it was not close to where the truck was and not a straight away where he was going to gain speed they couldnt pursue him especially since they had police surrounding the field so he couldnt escape on foot, I imagine there were more then 2 police vehicles. But thats just my assumption i wasnt there.
Ms. Air Force
7:26 pm on Saturday, February 11, 2012
V. Duvall,
I wasn't being rude at all.. I displayed the same attitude and behavior as you. Nonetheless.. I hope the dash cam, that WAS working, shows what happens and that it hadn't been tampered with... even if the mic wasn't working... hopefully we can at least "see" what happened. RIP Manny!
Ms. Air Force
7:30 pm on Saturday, February 11, 2012
V. Duvall,
Thanks for changing your tone.. BTW, I'm never on high horse... But your tone and attitude was uncalled for.. If you like I can copy and paste your comment if you are unclear what I'm talking about.. On second thought.. it's water under the bridge.. no need to rehash old BS..
V. Duvall
7:56 pm on Saturday, February 11, 2012
Air force, yeah you were rude. Even the PATCH said you needed to watch your language, and in your comment directed at me you used an expletive that was uncalled for. BTW there is no tape or disc so it would be really hard to 'mess with' I believe that the record is electronically downloaded as the deputies pass thru the gate at the substation when they return at the end of their shift. No one ever really touches it. Let's let the water stay under the bridge.
R.A.P.
8:52 pm on Saturday, February 11, 2012
Okay ladies and gentlemen...I just spent the last 20 minutes or so reading about this very interesting situation. One thing that I can't find a good answer to is WHY was there a want on this person as described in an earlier post?
4:44:58 Unit : 476 WANT IS HIT AND RUN AND CHILD ENDANGERMENT
He was obviously not in his right mind, or at least so it seems, if he had this want out on him. Who reported it and what are the circumstances? The only people there are the people that were there. Wait until more information becomes available and then, if appropriate, start your dirt throwing. And BTW, I did just join so that I could comment. I don't know anyone involved but I feel for all involved because either way it's an ugly situation.
V. Duvall
10:37 am on Sunday, February 12, 2012
RAP, Chris' explanation is correct. If a deputy was just coming on the radio, he or she may not have been aware of the previous radio transmissions. They want to know if they are looking for or approaching a "J-Walker" or someone that just "punched someone out"
Chris McLaughlin
9:45 pm on Saturday, February 11, 2012
R.A.P., someone earlier explained that that's just the terminology the Police us when calling for backup, like the 'want' is the answer to the question: "Why do you WANT backup?". So it equates to calling for backup to handle a hit and run driver with child endangerment. Someone with more knowledge of Police protocols could probably explain more...
Em
12:01 am on Sunday, February 12, 2012
I'm tired of hearing "he wouldn't hurt his family, he was a good Christian..." hello??! Josh Powell, good God-fearing boy hacked up and burned his baby boys recently. As far as the rest of it, you people weren't there. You can speculate all day, but the only truth here is that you don't know the truth yet.
Em
12:05 am on Sunday, February 12, 2012
However, some things are hard to ignore... I can't imagine he'd have fired into that vehicle if he'd known those kids were in it... I'll leave the rest alone.. too many what-ifs, maybes, if ands buts how's when's.... tragic either way
Chris McLaughlin
10:01 am on Sunday, February 12, 2012
Well, start imagining, Em. Supposedly the fact that the kids were in the car was not only KNOWN to the deputy who shot into the car while it was driving away with the kids in it, it was the REASON the deputy shot into the car as it was driving away with the kids in it.
I'm trying to give the deputy as much benefit of the doubt for time of day, fatigue, lack of daylight, low visibility, history of criminal action (running through the gate and not obeying commands), no proor knowledge of how great a guy Loggins was, and still I can't imagine a good reason to shoot a driver driving away in with kids in the back of the car. Even if you felt the kids were in danger, the threat from the driver would have to be so overwhelming to justify risking the additional danger you'd put them in by shooting at the driver in a moving vehicle as the kids are still in the back of the car. I wasn't there, but the kids were, so I hope they're not being threatened to lie to cover-up for the deputy's excessive force.
From what I've read, this officer made a split-second decision to fire into a moving vehicle, to save the kids in the back, and he and every officer in our community who would make that decision under those circumstances should be put on permanent unpaid administrative leave, and turn in their County firearms.
V. Duvall
10:42 am on Sunday, February 12, 2012
Too much speculation Chris
Chris McLaughlin
12:50 pm on Sunday, February 12, 2012
Really V, you think I'm speculating?? I think I've just been following along.
Re-read this article's title. Read it a few more times and let it sink in. Go watch the ABC video link again, and listen to Amormino 'explain, not defend' the deputy's actions/statements in this case.
I know we have to wait for the deputy's trial to see the dashboard video/audio, radio traffic, daughters' eyewitness accounts, etc, to know the full circumstances, but the part about disabling the car by shooting the driver dead while driving away, with the daughters in the back, is not disputed. That's not speculation, that's the official spokesperson's statement.
Speculation would be that the deputy was white, and that the OCSD does not want that fact (if it's true) revealed, because then the headline will change to 'White Police Officer kills unarmed Black man in front of his kids."
Would you like to speculate what the reaction to that headline would be??
As far as disarming all Peace Officers who think it's the right thing to do to shoot an unarmed man in front of his kids, for their protection, I'm sure I'm not the only one who thinks that the right corrective action to take away from this tragedy.
BigGalute
4:42 am on Sunday, February 12, 2012
We are all doomed once we allow policemen to fire at unarmed civilians. There simply are no extenuating circumstances allowed. That area on Pico has been crawling with aggressive cops for years. This should not come as a surprise. Although, Mr. happy trigger finger never expected to shoot a black man who was also a squeaky clean bible banging Marine. While tragic, blame city officials for allowing these cops to behave this way in their town. We are all guilty.
snafubar
7:27 am on Sunday, February 12, 2012
Let me see if I get this straight.
The cop says he was looking out for the interests of the children. So he shoots their father right in front of their own eyes? Sounds like an itchy trigger finger.
They'll have to live with that image burned into their brains for the rest of their lives. That's a helluva way to look out for someones interests.
With friends like that, who needs enemies?
James
9:19 am on Sunday, February 12, 2012
"Long before Josh Powell killed himself and his 7 and 5-year-old sons in a fire on Sunday, the pages of his parents’ divorce file portrayed him as a seriously troubled teen who attempted suicide, killed pet gerbils, once threatened his mother with a butcher knife and early on adopted his father’s allegedly disparaging view of women"
Is this the same person your talking about EM???? Someone who had severe issues as a child that were never properly addressed? Thats a good comparison, thanks for your two cents; reading your post wasted 5 seconds of my life i will never get back.
Yes we can only speculate, but if you think everything is normal in this case your seriously Ill yourself. IF the police did everything right they would immediately have disclosed why they were forced to shoot this man (before they found out he was a Marine) Then they pull ID and find out he is active duty Marine? and supervisors question what happen? Then they themselves dont agree so go into "s*it how can we somehow make this look justified mode. It's understandble if there is a way that it could look like the deputy was just in his shooting, then they wouldn't have so much poop on their face. Im sure right now a bunch of scummy lawyers are trying to get the big brains together to twist the story. Again if it was cut and dry and Sgt Loggins did something wrong they would be happy to have pasted the internet and news with how a Marine Messed up
Chris McLaughlin
10:53 am on Sunday, February 12, 2012
Something else just occurred to me regarding the victim not obeying the deputy's commands. As a parent, what is your instinct as far as protecting your kids from danger? Mine is pretty strong, to shield my kids from danger, or better yet remove them from sources of danger as quickly as possible. Put that in the context of Loggins coming back to his car, and seeing a cop with gun drawn, knowing that his kids are in the car, being a Marine and knowing what guns can do, and what would your reaction be to the deputy telling you get on the ground, when you don't have any weapons on you?? Would you obey the cop's directions?? Would you come into any available light so that the deputy could see that you're not armed, and then try to get your kids away from the guy with the gun as soon as possible?? I know I would. Perhaps the 'threatening' language from the victim was something like' "I'm a Marine, don't point that gun at me" or "you better get that gun away from my kids before I...".
Before all the hard-line pro-Police supporters on here talk about how important it is to follow Police commands, consider how strong an instinct it is to protect your kids from danger, even from a cop waving a gun around.
Ms. Air Force
12:14 pm on Sunday, February 12, 2012
Chris,
A friend of mine, who knew Manny as well, had the same theory. We both said, what if the kids were in danger not because of Manny but because of the cop. Perhaps the cop was saying something that Manny could have felt put the children in danger and wanted to get them out of the situation. It would be Cop vs Manny.. I know if I saw a gun drawn on me and my kids were in the car, the first thing would be to diffuse the situation as soon as possible. When this story first broke, I thought Manny reached for a phone to call someone and the cop fired on him. As I stated before.. this is really bizzare.
Em
12:14 pm on Sunday, February 12, 2012
Scary... nauseating.
Em
12:29 pm on Sunday, February 12, 2012
I should have said "its hard to imagine that to be an appropriate course of action?" Details. My point about Josh Powell was only to say that outside people's perception of someone is not always the reality of the situation. This goes for anyone. Seems lik families and/or communities are quite often shocked by behavior they never would have seen coming.. for anyone who thought they really knew someone... all just very sad and my thoughts are with those kids and the families left to pick up the pieces. No ill will intended.
Ronald Douglas Kennedy
12:37 pm on Sunday, February 12, 2012
8:47 am on Saturday, February 11, 2012 Any answers to the Four questions posted yesterday.
"Clearing the Vhicle is the Key Question" If cleard we would be looking at a different story for all. thanks Ron
Air Force. "So if the cop was concerned about the children"Good.-- and later-- Chris."The Sheriff's said they were looking for him away from the car for about 5 minutes. 3 minutes in they called it in as child endangerment. At 5 minutes in they're calling for the ambulance"
If Manny did run from the Car would not the Sheriff first Clear the Car First? On seeing the Children , you would think the Sheriff would automatically, place the Children in his patrol police car for their "Protective Custody," Safety First? Then run the licence Plate on Manny's Car, to see who they wear dealing with? Be fore running off in the dark Bang Bang .
Was toxicology tests also taken of the Sheriff, in this Civilian shootings ?
Em
1:24 pm on Sunday, February 12, 2012
I'm just going off what people in the community told the media. If it was common knowledge that Powell was nuts, she doubts her friend would have married him. Those facts were publicized after the fact. No need to be so nasty. Glad we're all adults here.
Em
1:24 pm on Sunday, February 12, 2012
She being Powell's wife's best friend.
Em
1:45 pm on Sunday, February 12, 2012
I am very cynical about the police. This cop looks guilty as hell, however, my point is ONLY that you don't always know someone like you think you do. Tearing each other apart because of differences of opinion will have no bearing on the outcome and just puts more weight on already heavy hearts. Maybe I AM ill for even involving myself. Lesson learned.
John Huddleston
5:25 pm on Sunday, February 12, 2012
A Sergeant in the USMC was irrational? Not likely!
By the time you become a Sergeant in the USMC you have learned to handle a lot pressure!
A frightened member of the San Clemente OCSD? More than likely!
Perhaps a boycott of San Clemente by Marines and Camp Pendleton civilian employees will show our true feelings and also the desire to get to the truth!
Flannery4
7:39 pm on Sunday, February 12, 2012
Wow, even more stupidity. You want the marines to "boycott" the city of San Clemente. Yeah, go after the business community in SC, that'll show the police who is boss.
V. Duvall
7:47 pm on Sunday, February 12, 2012
John, I don't know how far back in the comments you have read but I commented much earlier that "most deputy sheriffs are former military"and most of those are Marines, many of them Sgt's and many of them officers. So by the time they are an OCSD deputy out on patrol, most of them have already been Sgt or above in the USMC or some other branch of the United States Military. Yes please, boycott San Clemente. Wasn't it a Marine that planted a explosive device at SCHS the first day of this school year? That was irrational. and don't go misinterpret what I just said. I'm just tired of people ragging on the Sheriff's department. We just don't know what happened yet.
Connie Miller
11:55 pm on Monday, February 20, 2012
Actually, John, (and I agree with your post) when a situation escalates, gets very sticky and is warranted, a post commander can indeed give a 'confined to post' order. That would include military and civilian personnel.
James
6:35 pm on Sunday, February 12, 2012
Em, no ill will intended? "I'm tired of hearing "he wouldn't hurt his family, he was a good Christian.." In case you weren't able to tell most the people on this post are in support of Sgt Loggins. There is friends, family and co-workers posting and reading you compare this Marine to a looney. You quote the wifes friends, but I took my quote from the Powells own family. Ok maybe you didnt have ill will intended but your choice of words just happen to be very poor. I am sure there is a site full of margarets somewhere that would be happy to read your post.
Flannery4
7:58 pm on Sunday, February 12, 2012
Well said V. Duvall. Let's see what the facts actually are, rather than suggesting boycotts. I forgot about the marine planting an explosive device earlier this year. To follow Huddleston's "logic", the citizenry should have boycotted the marine base. Sometimes stupidity knows no bounds.
V. Duvall
8:13 pm on Sunday, February 12, 2012
I agree, boycotts are stupid. As far as I know the citizenry of San Clemente love the Marines, well, most people love most of the Marines. on the base believe that the TRI Cities here have adopted a battalion each. I've been to so many car washes I can't count, and I've even donated to them when my car was already washed! I've given baby stuff when people were collecting for baby showers for expectant marine wives on the base.
James
8:30 pm on Sunday, February 12, 2012
Flannery, what incident was this?
Flannery4
8:45 pm on Sunday, February 12, 2012
It was actually a Navy medic threatening to plant the device. My bad to refer to him as a marine.
Chris McLaughlin
9:30 pm on Sunday, February 12, 2012
Yes, it was a Corpsman from Pendleton who apparently wasn't coping well with transitioning to the Green Side. He didn't threaten to plant a bomb as much as thought about it, wrote it down, and didn't tell anyone, so kind of another over-reaction by the authorities, that time not ending in tragedy like this one. Anyway, he got sentenced last month. Here's a picture of Amormino holding up a picture of him, and more info on the story:
http://www.sanclementetimes.com/view/full_story/17291759/article-Bomb-Scare-Suspect-Pleads-Guilty--Sentenced-to-Four-Months-in-Brig?instance=eye_on_sc
V. Duvall
9:01 pm on Sunday, February 12, 2012
Yes I think he was from Pendleton, maybe not.James, on the first day of the 2011/2012 school year someone from the Military had either placed or threatened to place an explosive device at SCHS. The entire student body spent that whole day on the football field. Huge media event.
Chris McLaughlin
9:34 pm on Sunday, February 12, 2012
Rather than protest the City of San Clemente, why not go to the next City Council meeting, which will be two weeks from the date of the shooting, and ask what the progress is on thecase and if the City is taking any action in response to the tragedy:
Tuesday 02/21/2012
City Council Meeting
(TV-Channel 30 and HD-Channel 854)
6:00pm - Regular Meeting - City Hall Council Chambers
V. Duvall
9:41 pm on Sunday, February 12, 2012
That's not a bad idea. You might put more pressure on OCSD by going to a County Board of Supervisors meeting. There would probably be someone there with a higher rank than Lt. The City's Chief of Police Services holds the rank of Lt.
Chris McLaughlin
9:58 pm on Sunday, February 12, 2012
I would start local, although the next Bd of Supervisors meeting may be on the same morning as the SC City Council meeting, but contacting Patricia Bates's office immediately about this would be good to do. This is what it says on the City's website about the Police in San Clemente. You'd think using the high school track for exercise before work/school on a weekday would be a sanctioned, safe activity:
The Orange County Sheriff's Department provides law enforcement services for the City of San Clemente. 44 sworn and 13 professional staff members operate from the San Clemente station located at 100 Ave. Presidio providing services that include patrol, investigations, traffic enforcement, community support, drug education, parking control, and crime prevention. As always, the Sheriff's Department primary goal is to provide a safe environment for its community members to enjoy San Clemente's many amenities.
Chris McLaughlin
10:37 pm on Sunday, February 12, 2012
The next County Supervisors meeting (2/28) is a week after the next San Clemente City Council meeting. Here's our District's Supervisor's contact info in the meantime:
Patricia C. Bates
Supervisor, 5th District
County of Orange
333 W. Santa Ana Blvd.
Santa Ana, CA 92701
Phone 714.834.3550
Fax: 714.834.2670
PatBates@ocgov.com
James
3:40 am on Monday, February 13, 2012
V.devull, that was personnel from Pendleton, but he was a NAVY Corpsman who was U\A aka AWOL. They found a notebook in his room that suggested he may have intended to plant an explosive, but for the safety of the kids they removed all the kids from perceived danger; who would think to do that right?..lol.
Any how I know we are a department of the Navy, but Marines are like no other branch so really hard to compare us. Are we perfect? By no means, every Marine was once a civillians the Corps only changes those who accept the change, but generally the ones doing knuckle head stuff are new lower ranking Marines. Higher ranks don't get in trouble? Yes but its not as often. Same as police I like to think mybe in my nieve head that 90% of cops are there for the right reason and do a great job; and generally the ones who mess up are the newer ones. Thats why this 15 year veteran has me confused. Is he 10% who is a bad apple and made it this far? or is there more to the story we don't know, but why not defend the department if so? Like someone else mentioned a lot of the police forces are made up of prior Military. Most Marines who plan on getting out regardless or their job, have a plan of being a cop when they get out. So again maybe me being a Marine i am biased but with what facts we DO have I am giving Sgt Loggins the benefit of the doubt. People bashing a Marine who we do know or a dupty no one yet knows? I think hey lets respect this Marine and his Family.
Lee Coddens
9:22 am on Monday, February 13, 2012
Lemme see if I have this straight: deputies surrounded the field so that the allegedly dangerous Marine coudn't escape; but the 2 children in the suv were left unprotected to the extent that the Marine was able to return to the vehicle, get in, trurn key in ignition, necessitating the deputy's use of deadly force in order to protect those very same children? Hell, that ain't a thing and it don't mean nothin'.
Bo Bo
9:35 am on Monday, February 13, 2012
1. If the officer pulled him over he should of blocked the car in as he left it for sure.
2. The first thing to be done is check the car out for other occupants.
3. If you want to stop the subject you would NEVER let him reenter the car. PERIOD.
4. Kill him to end the siege. Claim you were trying to save yourself or others. Beat him like Rodney King while 10 cops watch and cheer!!!!
Ronald Douglas Kennedy
9:43 am on Monday, February 13, 2012
Lee your right on point
rhuffaker
12:14 pm on Monday, February 13, 2012
The crickets are chirping. Nothing from the OCSD or news media about this incident. Our troops are at war and I know rules of engagement/escalation of force policies are drilled into their heads. This type of incident is not tolerated in our military. Why is it tolerated in our Sheriffs department? Imagine if our troops did the same thing to an Iraqi/Afghani? Imagine the outcry? This shooting occured at home and from what I've read so far, there is no logical reason for this shooting. It does not add up and it does not make sense. I may change my tune if I see a dash cam video/deputy's audio device. Since it's been a week I doubt the OCSD has anything that would justify this shooting. If it was a mistake the OCSD needs to have a bit of empathy and explain to Loggins family what happened. Then explain to the people they serve and protect how an unarmed man can be executed in front of his kids.
Mr Salty
12:48 pm on Monday, February 13, 2012
The silence from OCSD is deafening.
CYA right ?
http://www.copblock.org/
David
1:36 pm on Monday, February 13, 2012
Has the PIG been cleared yet?
Chris McLaughlin
1:48 pm on Monday, February 13, 2012
David, I'm pretty upset about this incident, too, but calling the cops names only allows them to dismiss the concerned citizens as fringy yahoos, and your comment will probably just get deleted by the Patch editor anyway. I think the best action is to begin letting local elected officials know that you won't let this go, and they can expected to get unelected if they don't handle it right. Two of the five San Clemente City Councilmembers are up for election this November. Their next meeting is a week from tomorrow at City Hall at 6 p.m. How many people can you fit in your car???
Chris McLaughlin
2:13 pm on Monday, February 13, 2012
San Clemente's Congressman is also up for re-election this year, and should feel obligated to weigh in on this issue:
http://calvert.house.gov/Contact/
but with the re-districting taking place this year, Darrell Issa will most likely be San Clemente's Congressman starting next year, and he's prior military and has been Camp Pendleton's Congressman for a while, so he may be worth contacting as well:
Office of Congressman Darrell Issa
District_Office
1800 Thibodo Road, Suite #310
Vista, CA 92081
Phone: 760.599.5000
Fax: 760.599.1178
Ms. Air Force
9:45 am on Wednesday, February 15, 2012
Chris.. Check this out!
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lanow/2012/02/union-blames-marine-killed-by-deputy-for-fatal-shooting.html
Chris McLaughlin
11:25 am on Wednesday, February 15, 2012
Thanks again, Airman!! Just Commented on it, and posted it to my Facebook Wall. Of course the Sheriff's Union is going to back Deputy John Doe unconditionally, but fortunately the law doesn't. Cops don't have a 'License to Kill', like James Bond or something. They have a very narrow scope of when deadly force is authorized, and when they use it outside of those bounds, they are as personally liable as if I went out and starting shooting people.
I would like to believe that shooting an unarmed man dead, who's not attacking you, in front of his kids, without making any attempt to use non-lethal means first to mitigate a potentially dangerous situation should be categorically unauthorized. If it's not, I aim to use legal means to make it so.
dave
2:57 pm on Monday, February 13, 2012
This is from the Orange County website...I would laugh but it is waaaaay too tragic.
Sandra Hutchens
Sheriff-Coroner
Mission Statement
The men and women of the Orange County Sheriff's Department are dedicated to the protection of all we serve. We provide exceptional law enforcement services free from prejudice or favor, with leadership, integrity, and respect.
Core Values
Integrity without compromise;
Service above self;
Professionalism in the performance of duty;
Vigilance in safeguarding our community.
Douglas Martin
4:35 pm on Monday, February 13, 2012
The Orange County Sheriff is also the Coroner. I have had personal experience with the conflict-of-interest that this situation presents. That 17-week experience led to my distrust of the entire OCSD, especially the Coroner's Office. They are truly imcompetent. Whatever they say should be independently reviewed.
V. Duvall
11:44 am on Tuesday, February 14, 2012
I agree that the Coroner's office and the Sheriff's office should be separate like the County of Los Angeles. They have a "Medical Examiner" that is not the Sheriff. Those people are Medical Doctors and Pathologists. In the County of Orange, most of the people that "do the cutting" are not medical doctors but crime scene people. I never could figure that out.
Cindy Callahan-Farnum
12:15 pm on Tuesday, February 14, 2012
I know this will matter little to most of you, but the staff in the OCSD Coroners office are a good bunch a people. They regularly support Marines/Sailors aboard Camp Pendleton through various support groups/non-profits, and many of them are former Marines themselves. Although it would be a good practice to have the two departments separate, I, personally, trust that the people in the coroner's office would WANT the truth to come out regardless of what they find.
CD
8:45 pm on Monday, February 13, 2012
This is absolutely disgusting. Shooting unarmed people is the work of a cold-blooded killer. I'm sure this deputy was in the right frame of mind to blow the marine's brains out in front of his children. No, he was angry because the marine wouldn't listen to him. The marine's blood cries out from the ground. Murderer!
V. Duvall
1:03 pm on Tuesday, February 14, 2012
I agree that the Deputy Coroner's are a good bunch of people that do a good job under bad circumstances. And I know they do want the truth to come out. I was just saying that the two offices should be separate. We need Medical Doctors who are pathologists preforming autopsies.
Douglas Martin
1:39 pm on Tuesday, February 14, 2012
My experience with the OCSheriff/Coroner's Office was a negative one. The medical examiner was an M.D., but was only 14 months out of medical school. He went to med school in Guadalajara, then completed a one-year internship at an Army base in Texas. Two months later he determined the cause of death of one my immediate family members, and got it completely wrong. When I complained to then-Sheriff Corona, I received an arrogant, "how dare you question us" response. Three of the four people who's names were on the letterhead of that response, are now convicted felons.
All physicians are required to complete a 1-year internship before they can apply for a license to practice medicine. This used to be known as a "general practitioner". Specialty physicians, including pathologists, are then required to complete a multi-year residency in order to obtain board certification in their field. Medical examiners, like the ones employed by the OCSD, need only complete an internship. They can start deciding how someone died - which is VERY important to a family - just one year after completing med school.
The coroner's deputy in charge of our case was rude, arrogant, inexperienced and uninformed. The SO's on scene were not only rude to us, they were completely unprofessional, making flippant remarks about our deceased family member. I have no use for Orange County sheriff's deputies or coroner's deputies. EVERYTHING that they do or say should be reviewed by an outside investigator.
LeAna Bui
1:40 pm on Tuesday, February 14, 2012
I am not related to the police or the marines. I'm just a community member following a local story. While it does, indeed, seem to be a tragic outcome for a family who has lost a loving father (by all accounts here) and a full investigation is definitely called for. I think we would all do well to think for a moment - what if this man had been allowed to drive away with two young girls and it turned out he was a sexual predator or kidnapper? Would we then be blaming this officer for not better protecting them?
I'm not excusing the officer because I don't have all the facts, but I'm saying we could all stand to keep an open mind and let the investigation be resolved before making a judgement. Thoughts and prayers to Mr. Loggins' family and to all those connected to this awful event.
peoplewatcher
2:09 pm on Tuesday, February 14, 2012
That logic could be used to justify any shooting, anywhere, anytime. What if the shooting victim turned out to be a mass murderer or child molester. What would have led the deputy to believe that Sgt. Loggins likely was a sexual predator or kidnapper? Without cause is without cause
Terry Robinson
10:02 am on Thursday, February 16, 2012
Well said.
Daniel Tipping
4:11 pm on Tuesday, February 14, 2012
Bottomline: Do as commanded or face extermination.
That is the definition of a 'police state'.
Douglas Martin
4:37 pm on Tuesday, February 14, 2012
Now it is really a cluster:
http://www.ocregister.com/news/loggins-340272-deputy-dominguez.html
Chris McLaughlin
6:34 pm on Tuesday, February 14, 2012
This has got to be unprecented, first the official OCSD spokesman saying he's 'explaining, not defending' the deputy's actions, and now the union spokesman is making statements before the official inquiry is concluded?? There must be some serious internal struggle going on right now within the Department, on hanging this deputy out to dry, versus the standard knee-jerk defense of anything and everything any deputy does on duty.
The deputy says the victim was acting irrational?? What's so irrational about getting your kids away from a cop waving a gun around when you're not armed or dangerous?? What do you call shooting an unarmed man in front of his kids as he's driving away?? Was the victim wrong in fearing for his life??
citizen
6:46 pm on Tuesday, February 14, 2012
I hope the officer gets the death penalty. I cannot find any rational explanation for this cold blooded murder. I know however that he will undoubtedly get a slap on the wrist, maybe some paid time off and then be back on the force in a year or two.
Nancy
7:04 pm on Tuesday, February 14, 2012
Some of you are going over the top. You want a death penalty for a possible mistake made by an officer? As much as I think the outcome of what happened is horrible, there is no reason to believe it was "cold-blooded murder." Not premeditated, not blood-thirsty nor for personal gain--all of which would apply to criminals. Call it what it probably is--a terrible mistake, poor judgment, a tragedy. But to shout out "string him up" is intentional brutality.
Chris McLaughlin
7:08 pm on Tuesday, February 14, 2012
'Intentional brutality' Nancy?? What do you call what they did to Sgt. Loggins??
I see a lot of the Police supporters on here calling for giving the deputy the benefit of the doubt. How much of that was given to Sgt. Loggins??
peoplewatcher
7:30 pm on Tuesday, February 14, 2012
Nancy, When the OCSD steps up to the plate and asks forgiveness for a horrible mistake we can then decide whether or not such forgiveness is warranted. However we are a week into this now and all we have is a statement saying Sgt. Loggins brought all this on himself. I personally will wait for the kids statements and the dash cam audio and video to decide if this was just horribly bad judgement by the OCSD or true evil at work.
Nancy
7:35 pm on Tuesday, February 14, 2012
An eye for an eye for an eye ad infinitum. Where does it end? Yes, the truth must absolutely be revealed and appropriate punishment should follow.
LeAna Bui
10:23 pm on Tuesday, February 14, 2012
We, the general public are probably never going to know exactly what happened. The rush to judgement being displayed on this page is absolutely frightening to me.
Nancy
11:02 pm on Tuesday, February 14, 2012
I agree, Leana. It hasn't looked good for law enforcement with the various changes of how things happened and it looks like a tragedy from any way you look at it. My interest in this from the beginning was to hope that it would not be swept under the rug and that any errors on the part of the police would be addressed honestly.
Chris McLaughlin
1:04 am on Wednesday, February 15, 2012
'Rush to Judgement'? Have you seen the Police Blotter?? At 4:41 Deputy John Doe called in a traffic stop. At 4:46 he's calling for the ambulance. They keep saying Sgt. Loggins was out of the car for 'about 5 minutes', but that's actually the total time from crime to execution. Talk about a rush to judgement! What could an unarmed man have possibly said that could warrant a death sentence, carried out immediately in front of his own kids?? There was no attempt to use non-lethal force to subdue the suspect or the car. There was no hostage negotiator called in. There was no gun or knife or other weapon evident, no cooling off period for a suspect who looked out of control. Deputy John Doe was judge, jury, and executioner, in about 5 minutes.
On the other hand, OCSD and the DA have had a full week to investigate, and I don't believe they've even filed charges. There's only two witnesses who are not County employees to interview, very little physical evidence, and they own all the video/audio tape, so what's taking so long?? Let me guess, toxicology tests?? That's solely to try to justify the Deputy's actions, but I would say it doesn't matter what the tox reports say, because the Deputy didn't have time to review them in the five minutes he took to award the death penalty and carry out the sentence, so either way, intoxicated or not, it's never okay to kill an unarmed man, who's not threatening you, in front of his kids, without trying to use non-lethal means first.
Terry Robinson
7:19 am on Wednesday, February 15, 2012
Can you say Salem witch trials.......a mob or pack mentality is definitely a frightening event to observe.
Chris McLaughlin
11:27 am on Wednesday, February 15, 2012
Thank for the tip, Terry! I just quoted The Crucible on the LA Times article this morning...
Ms. Air Force
9:44 am on Wednesday, February 15, 2012
In case you all haven't seen this crap! Take a look.. The cops are protecting their own.. AGAIN!
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lanow/2012/02/union-blames-marine-killed-by-deputy-for-fatal-shooting.html
Roy Rivenburg
11:29 am on Wednesday, February 15, 2012
For the record, Patch had this story yesterday morning:
http://sanclemente.patch.com/articles/deputies-union-defends-marine-shooting
Terry Robinson
10:05 am on Wednesday, February 15, 2012
WHOA.....I know there is a lot of anger over this shooting and nothing should be taken lightly but, until we have the needed facts and we still don't,...consider this, why would anyone want to be a policeman and be willing to put their lives on the line 40+ hours a week, 20+ years, to protect people who have such terrible disdain for them. When I read some of these comments, I can't believe anyone is willing to risk their lives for us. Talk about PTSD in the military....what about our private sector protectors. No matter the outcome in the tragedy, probable cause or not....many lives have been severely damaged...including the officer involved, who will have to live with this the rest of his life. I do not like nor do I do think police should over-react but then again I ask, are they actually over-reacting. How do I know they were over-reacting, I wasn't there? I really don't know what I would do, if in their shoes, confronting possible death, on a regular basis. They have a lot to process in mere seconds. That is why we must obey their orders....like it or not.
Chris McLaughlin
11:38 am on Wednesday, February 15, 2012
Gonna have to disagree with you there, Terry, on the obeying Police orders, whether we like it or not. We haven't fully descended into a facist/police state (yet), and I certainly never will (in my mind at least).
I know this is a touchy subject for the Police, that they never want to give anyone reason/justification/legal cover for disobeying their orders, but they have their orders/legal limits, too, and I don't think killing an unarmed man who's not attacking them without trying to use non-lethal means to contain the situation first is legal. Or, at least, it shouldn't be. I think the punishment for disobeying Police orders should be getting arrested, having your vehicle barricaded, being physically pinned down by several cops and hand-cuffed, dragged down to the station and hauled in front of a judge, jail time, fines, etc, but immediate execution in front of your kids?? If and when that's legal...I don't want to think about what's next then...
Grant
2:34 pm on Wednesday, February 15, 2012
Really,Terry- are you suggesting that if we don't obey a policeman's orders, than we should not be surprised if we get shot and killed? If that's the case, then we really ARE living in a police state.You ask "How do I know they were over-reacting, I wasn't there?"
I would think that the death of an unarmed man should be sufficient evidence that the police over-reacted, no?
Terry Robinson
8:09 am on Thursday, February 16, 2012
Chris...I can't find your Crucible quote...would you please post it here. Also regarding your disagreement with me. I am not saying that I think that police are above the law....they are not, but they have an ugly job to do and things can go very wrong unintentionally. I also don't think that their need to be tough means we live in a fascist state. Do some go over the top...no doubt. But back to Manny. Initially, how could they know a thing about him and what if anything they were up against? There are a lot of very vicious criminals out there, as you well know, and I think that the police are given no choice but to error on the side that a person they confront is a danger. If a policeman is gentle and assumes that all people he confronts are innocent....he is nothing but a victim himself. I might add that we know nothing about this policeman either. Nothing about his methods, his history, his approach to handling volatile situations. All we know is from assumption and conjecture. To me...I think it is a very good thing to have watchdogs and to see so many people concerned. I don't care for any assumptions or mob mentalities on either side.
Chris McLaughlin
8:56 am on Thursday, February 16, 2012
I think I may be mis-quoting the exact text of the play, but I think this faithfully represents the main idea, and why he entitled it The Crucible:
My favorite line from 'The Crucible', the Arthur Miller play about the Salem Witch Trials and how our court system boils down events to their raw elements: "We burn a hot fire here, the truth is going to come out."
Even more so these days, the Police, and everyone really, should know that you're not going to get away with hiding anything anymore, so don't even bother trying to lie or put up a smokescreen. Lying and delaying the truth just makes people madder and not trust you the next time something smells like a cover-up.
Of course the Police have a tough job with an incredible amount of stress and danger, but the Police Union doesn't seem to realize that their official version of the events plainly describe an extrajudicial execution of an unarmed man in front of his kids, apparently for the crime of not obeying verbal Police orders. If that does not basically describe a 'Police State', I don't know what does, and that's their Official Version!! That doesn't say anything about who the victim was, or who the Deputy was, or any other extentuating circumstances. I hope the court system boils this case down to these basic principles and rules in favor of us citizens not having to live in fear of immediate execution for not following Police orders by getting shot in the head in front of our kids.
Terry Robinson
10:17 am on Thursday, February 16, 2012
Chris...thanks so much for posting the quote.....good one for sure. Good point that the longer this goes on the hotter people will get. Could the investigation be quicker? I'm not familiar with the process. I would add this about the witch trials in regard to the police being the accused here....Ordeal by water was later associated with the witch-hunts of the 16th and 17th centuries, an accused who sank was considered innocent, while floating indicated witchcraft. Pretty much ruined one way or the other.
James
12:01 pm on Wednesday, February 15, 2012
Also Terry idont think anyone hates the police and agree that its a tough job u have tomake life changing decisions in a nick oftime. At the same time if YOU choose the wrong thing, u shouldnt be excused becauae u tried ur best. Theyhold military to rules of engagemnt with known terrorist, why cant irrational man get them opportunity in the united states?
Bo Bo
12:34 pm on Wednesday, February 15, 2012
A lot of losers on this site Mind boggling.
1. Doesn't matter if the cop or the victim were Marines or not. They were humans.
2. Did the victim warrant being murdered when other police personnel were already on the scene.
3. What physic powers did the officer have that made him think that this was a life and death situation?
I have seen, on the tube, police vehicles going like a bat out of Hades chasing someone for not stopping. These chases have run into hours while the police speed after the violator until he crashes into other human beings and kills and maims the victims. Not one of the pursuing 10 police cars, 3 motorcycles or 2 helicopters fire a shot!!! Duhhhh.
Andddd yet this poor guy is killed while standing still?.
Grant
2:36 pm on Wednesday, February 15, 2012
Bo Bo speaks the truth!
Bo Bo
10:11 am on Thursday, February 16, 2012
Thank you Grant for realizing it when I speak it. I have been in the service and also worked for the police dept. What has this to do with the killing? NOTHING.
You do not need hours and months of police training to know that this was wrong.
All you need is common sense. Guess it was in short supply.
Douglas Martin
12:44 pm on Wednesday, February 15, 2012
Releasing details of the investigation to a union, but not to the public, seems WAY out of wack.
I'd say "Call your elected representitives", but Bates is a "Law and Order (i.e.; police state) Republican, and Calvert owes the cops one for NOT shooting HIM when he tried to drive away in 1993, when two Corona, California, police officers found Calvert with a woman in his car, his pants unzipped and his penis exposed. When one officer spotlit the interior of the vehicle, Calvert attempted to drive away. The officers instructed him to stop three times before he complied. Calvert told the police that he and the woman, who said she was a convicted prostitute and a heroin user, were "just talking."
Grant
2:22 pm on Wednesday, February 15, 2012
Wow, I hadn't heard that story about Ken Calvert, although I've heard plenty of stories about his unscrupulous financial dealings. Calvert is one guy I really wish the voters would turn out of office. But since we voters are regularly subjected to his glossy mailers and the spin on his emailed "news letters", that seems unlikely.
LeAna Bui
1:47 pm on Wednesday, February 15, 2012
All:
The investigation very well may prove that the police officer is guilty of a crime and will have to stand trial. There may well be no good justification for what happened. My belief remains that we should allow the investigation to follow it's course before we "rush to judgement." Either way, I'm very sorry for the family and friends of Mr. Loggins.
V. Duvall
2:08 pm on Wednesday, February 15, 2012
Some of you people really scare me. Many of you are ready to execute the cop which seems to be exactly what you are complaining he did to the Marine. I'd call that a rush to judgement too. We all still need to wait to see what the investigation brings. Do we know how many and which agencies are doing an investigation? Has NCIS picked it up? Or are we only expecting results from OCSD.
Roy Rivenburg
2:14 pm on Wednesday, February 15, 2012
NCIS is assisting with the investigation, but Orange County is the lead agency. That info is from an NCIS spokesman.
Bo Bo
10:15 am on Thursday, February 16, 2012
Give it some thought.
1. Dispatcher
2. Shooter.
3. Kids.
4. Other officers.
So called investigation should of been over days ago..............
Ms. Air Force
4:41 pm on Wednesday, February 15, 2012
I just feel like the cop will get away with this.. but will pay in a wrongful death suit!
http://matchbin-assets.s3.amazonaws.com/public/sites/956/assets/5DJV_PRESS_RELEASE___2_14_12__AOCDS_Statement_on_SAN_CLEMENTE_DIS.pdf
Bo Bo
10:16 am on Thursday, February 16, 2012
I have no doubt.
Connie Miller
10:10 pm on Monday, February 20, 2012
I hope it's in the millions - four children to provide a home for, to raise and educate.
Joliet IL
9:26 pm on Wednesday, February 15, 2012
I don't allow these articles & comments to upset me...So friends & supporters of Manny please don't allow them to upset & anger you also supporters of the deputy...everyone is untitled to there opinion but please do it in a respectively Manner..Lets all be in prayer for both families & also in prayer that the truth is revealed..Stop the name calling & post bullying...I thank all the supporters thats also seeking Justice for Manny...Have a Blessed night
Terry Robinson
6:16 am on Thursday, February 16, 2012
Well said and Amen. The comments posted over this tragedy are almost like a classroom and presenting a lesson into human hearts and minds. The hateful ones are really scaring my ears.
Bo Bo
10:20 am on Thursday, February 16, 2012
Terry,
People like you are why these things happen. You are afraid to voice what is right but instead rely on others to present their convictions and then criticize them.
I do feel for your scaring ears though. May Allah save them!!!!!!!!
Terry Robinson
12:02 pm on Thursday, February 16, 2012
To Bo Bo.....
I am certainly not afraid to voice what is right. If you knew me you would know that. I have no convictions about what is right because I don't know what happened. You mentioned that people like me are why these things happen. I would sooner hope that people like me try to keep a cool head and not condemn before the fact.
Bo Bo
12:57 pm on Thursday, February 16, 2012
Terry
Open your eyes... You have the facts. Anything after this will be hearsay because the Sgt. is dead. There is no other side. Only the police and politician side.
If you get to other sites you will see the close up of the SUV is undamaged. How did it break thru a fence and there is no damage?
Terry Robinson
4:34 pm on Thursday, February 16, 2012
What I will do is continue to question and demand factual information.
What I won't do is make assumptions based on speculation....on either side.
That is what you are taught when chosen to be on a jury. Have you been on a jury
Bo Bo?
Bo Bo
7:34 am on Friday, February 17, 2012
Terry
I have been on many juries. High profile ones included terrorism and murder.
Both resulted in conviction.
Where are you going to demand factually information from? I thought you would of accomplished that by now?
Douglas Martin
11:35 am on Thursday, February 16, 2012
Base command is weighing in on this now.
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lanow/2012/02/marine-commander-displeased-at-comments-about-marine-killed-by-deputy.html
Roy Rivenburg
11:38 am on Thursday, February 16, 2012
Patch had the story a few minutes earlier: http://sanclemente.patch.com/articles/pendleton-col-criticizes-response-to-marine-killing
Douglas Martin
11:47 am on Thursday, February 16, 2012
Yes you did, and better written, too.
Ronald Douglas Kennedy
5:08 pm on Thursday, February 16, 2012
A Question for the third time. Why was the Yukon not cleared First. And now wear told "screaming children" or not, Put in a Police car for Protective Custody?
You would think a Female Officer would have been called to help the Children. Or one of the Male Officer with children to help them calm down, as good daddy's do?
You would also think as soon as the Yukon was cleared police cars would block it in from moving with out there OK?
I agree wears the Videdo & Voice
Terry Robinson
7:46 am on Saturday, February 25, 2012
Strictly a pondering here as I have no true answer.....consider that maybe the police underestimated this situation and were trying not to use excessive force. Forceful methods that most likely would been taken automatically in a serious high crime area. Seems like stronger methods from the onset would certainly have prevented Sgt. Loggins from returning to his car where his children were then compromised.
James
5:19 pm on Thursday, February 16, 2012
I also like that now there were screaming children, but when they first reported story they reported, no one elses words "it is unclear if there was anyone else in the vehicle" why even comment it at all if you know your lying. Really Mr Amormino? Like you werent briefed before you talked. but wait for the final investigation it will tell the truth...lol whatever it would be nice if it did
Terry Robinson
7:31 am on Saturday, February 25, 2012
I need a definition of what is considered excessive force by police.
Chris McLaughlin
1:14 pm on Saturday, February 25, 2012
Yes, Terry, finally something we totally agree on: What is considered excessive force?? What guidelines are established for OCSD to follow/criteria to be met, prior to shooting someone dead in front of their kids??
I went to my City Council meeting this week and asked that very question, and they referred me to our local Police Services office in our town. The local Police Services office and our Chief of Police Services referred me to the County level, the Professional Standards Division (PSD), and said they handle all inquires to ensure uniform and prompt responses. (What could be more uniform and prompt than an Internet-facing website with updated information??) They gave me a phone number to call, which I'll have to use since the OCSD website section for PSD doesn't look like it has anything regarding current Police procedures, except for maybe the Internal Affairs Unit, and to file an official Complaint. That may be the best way to go actually, to try to get an official response on what the current guidelines are. Maybe referring me to the PSD is code for "File an official complaint, or shut the front door, but either way we don't want to talk to you on the record." Anyway, here's the link to the form. It sounds like several Commenters may want to use it more often:
http://egov.ocgov.com/vgnfiles/ocgov/Sheriff-Coroner/Docs/Division/Personnel_Complaint_Form.pdf
Chris McLaughlin
1:26 pm on Saturday, February 25, 2012
In fairness, here's the link to the OCSD website page to File a Commendation for a Sheriff's Deputy. I would be happy to file one for any OC Sheriff's Deputy that can let me know what the current protocol is for discharging your County-issued firearm on duty:
http://egov.ocgov.com/ocgov/Sheriff-Coroner%20-%20Sandra%20Hutchens/Commands%20and%20Divisions/Professional%20Services%20Command/Professional%20Standards/How%20to%20File%20a%20Commendation%20for%20an%20Employee
I can't believe the round-around I'm getting on trying to research something as basic as when a Cop is allowed to shoot someone. Like it's supposed to be a secret, or is it unclear when you can start blowing citizens away on the street?? I would hope it's perfectly clear to all who carry a gun for our protection on how and when they can use it. I should be able to ask any officer driving around with gun the same question, and should get the same uniform and prompt answer from every cop on duty.
The fact they can't easily respond with these rules for public review is even more disturbing from a public safety perspective. It's not just the cops who should know exactly when they can shoot people. Every citizen should know the rules, too, so they're not unpleasantly surprised at an officer's lack of restraint, like Sgt. Loggins was.
Terry Robinson
2:50 pm on Saturday, February 25, 2012
Thank you for the info Chris...I will take a look. Don't think I will be able to find out any more than you did. Obviously shooting is excessive but so many out here have expressed lots of opinions on what they consider to be excessive...even that being commanded to follow police orders is excessive....hence my desire for a definition. Do the guidelines actually change...become dated or out dated? I guess they could depending on location, increase in crime rate etc....but one thing for sure, Since I was a child many moons ago, I was taught to respect police and to obey and I do so willingly and it doesn't make me angry to do so. Somehow I understood that not doing so would be a very bad idea. Call it Vulcan logic.
enea ostrich
8:02 am on Saturday, February 25, 2012
A man was shot and killed because he was irrational. That doesn't seem right, any way you look at it unless he was drugged and even then I have heard of plenty of drug cases where they just run them down and brace them down and cuff them and give them the law given right to go to jail for the night and they can get out when they post bail. I think the fact that the cop is just giving us the obvious answer for him that he defended the kids is amazing. He actually is making a defense statement when he says it's also based on what the guy said to him. That is really weak, considering people that are on dope say worse things then anyone can imagine, but yet because they are high it's waived off as just irrationality that will go away when they are sober. How about the cases of domestic violence? Will the cop shoot to kill the man who is being irrational to his wife? I am not condoning violence in the home, but even a violent man has the right to go to jail and not get shot. I am not in law enforcement but it peeves me to read about this and see that there is no reasonable explanation that the cop can come up with in "shooting to kill". That to me, dear readers here, is a case of a cop gone supremely mad and made a choice that will haunt him til the day he dies. I say karma will get him and God will take care of this if the law doesn't.
Terry Robinson
10:12 am on Saturday, February 25, 2012
If only we lived in a perfect world where there was no crime and no need for police. If only we were dealt a full hand before be had to make a decision that could end in disaster. In the real world..one can only wish and hope and think and pray.
Connie Miller
8:26 pm on Saturday, February 25, 2012
For your consideration:
Point 1: The OCSD claim that Manny was 'irrational,' Let's see. He had collided with a gate that had always been open. He got out of the car to inspect the damage to gate and vehicle, they walked to the track to see if anyone was in fact using it. Even for a quiet-natured man, he was likely upset. To my mind that does not equate to irrational. Just my take ...
Point 2. The girls in the car were screaming, perhaps for their Dad because they saw policemen with guns surrounding the car. Remember, a 14 year old has enough judgment to baby sit.
Connie Miller
9:20 pm on Saturday, February 25, 2012
If only two girls were not traumatized for life, with their father's blood, brains and bone splattered all over them. If only they were not deprived of their loving father forever. If only they would not wake up screaming from the nightmares. If only a toddler could remember her father. If only a baby were not born without a father. If only a wife were not deprived of the support of a loving husband.
Jenn B
11:07 am on Sunday, February 26, 2012
has there been any information about what the daughters witnessed?
chris adams
8:38 pm on Sunday, February 26, 2012
dont you know by now every thing a cop does is right no matter what
Terry Robinson
6:27 am on Monday, February 27, 2012
Chris...that is quite untrue. Police lose their jobs quite often and some even end up in prison. There are good and bad in every single walk of life, unfortunately police are not exempt. That said.....when it comes to a typical need for protection....there are good guys and there are bad guys. The police are the good guys and I am ever so grateful for them. They have saved my @$$ more than once.
Terry Robinson
8:09 am on Sunday, February 26, 2012
There is no doubt that there will be a lot of suffering by all involved, their families and friends. Most likely, they will carry this with them for as long as they live.
chris adams
4:20 pm on Monday, February 27, 2012
i am sure the two girls whos dad was murdered in cold blood under the color of authority love the police like you terry.
Connie Miller
10:39 am on Sunday, February 26, 2012
Terry, I wonder if the Trooper ran the license plate on the SUV and identified Manny as a Marine NCO. If not, why not. It might have made all the difference.
Terry Robinson
12:28 pm on Sunday, February 26, 2012
Maybe...maybe not. The deputy was also a former Marine.
enea ostrich
12:07 pm on Sunday, February 26, 2012
Connie brought up a very good point here—the kids screamed when they saw the cop shoot their Dad. That definitely would be a natural reaction for anyone, much less a kid. The deputy claims he did it for the sake of the children but what boggles my mind is that he wasn’t at all concerned with the scientific fact of a possible ricochet effect in the car when he shot Manny?
Question: how did the cop know the kids were in the car? Was that discovered before he approached the car or after the fact of shooting Manny? That is the key question to answer for the jury eventually, and the question that will haunt this case when it goes to trial…until it is explicitly answered and there is an end to the trial.
My last point is that Manny was known to run at that location on a regular basis by everyone near or at this location (that would include cops). Also too, if this deputy was fifteen years and an officer of the law, wouldn’t routine checks on license plates be the first thing he would look for as soon as he saw anything?
Terry Robinson
12:33 pm on Sunday, February 26, 2012
Enea..have you read this article from the Patch...Police shooting avoidable, experts say? Particularly the section on procedural failure.
http://sanclemente.patch.com/articles/police-expert-loggins-shooting-raises-thorny-questions
According to the article....the children were screaming before their father was shot.
Douglas Martin
12:13 pm on Sunday, February 26, 2012
OK here's how the OCSD handles a eerily similar case in Dan Point last Monday. A dad acting odly (driving the wrong way on PCH) with his two daughters in the car.
It's clear that the OCSD put some spin on the story, and it's also clear that the Orange County Register just went with it.
Here's the blotter record (I'll post the actual record in a "reply")
It's a good thing that deputy Sandberg is on leave. What if he had lulled this man over?
At 1630 a call came in from an informing MOTORIST - NOT the kid, with NFD (no further details).
At 1635 it appears that the child did call 911, and that the CHP was tracking the cell phone.
At 1637 the last cell hit was at Alcazar and PCH.
At 1639 the car is found at Golden Lantern and PCH.
At 1641 - 11 minutes after the first call - the OCSD is informed that the "dad was sick", and dispatch says it may be a diabetic reation.
Douglas Martin
12:14 pm on Sunday, February 26, 2012
[2/20/2012 17:59:11 : pos5 : NOORDMANDM] [Cleared with unit 338K] [2/20/2012 17:51:33 : pos5 : NOORDMANDM] Unit : 135 UN 97 SC HOSP EMILE 63195.3 [2/20/2012 17:45:36 : pos5 : NOORDMANDM] Unit : 135 SMILE 63194.0 FROM CITY HALL TO STOP AT PCH AND COPPER LANTERN [2/20/2012 16:41:44 : pos12 : LANGDONMD] 7 YEAR OLD WAS REPORTING HER DAD WAS SICK AND THE VEH WAS STILL MOVING..STA 10 TRANSFER..THEIR DISPATCHER ADVISED POSSIBLE DIABETIC REACTION [2/20/2012 16:39:46 : pos5 : JMURPHY] Unit : 135 OCFA 97 [2/20/2012 16:39:04 : pos5 : JMURPHY] Unit : 338K COPPER LANTERN & PCH [2/20/2012 16:37:47 : pos12 : LANGDONMD] 34000 ALCAZAR [2/20/2012 16:36:51 : pos12 : LANGDONMD] LAST CELL HIT ON ALCAZAR OFF PCH [2/20/2012 16:36:14 : pos12 : LANGDONMD] HAVE UNITS PC ON ALCAZAR [2/20/2012 16:35:33 : pos13 : guzacm] OCFA ENRT TO THE AREA [2/20/2012 16:35:17 : pos5 : JMURPHY] Unit : 332 C3 [2/20/2012 16:35:16 : pos12 : LANGDONMD] PER CHP GOLDEN LANTERN AND DEL PRADO [2/20/2012 16:35:07 : pos5 : JMURPHY] Unit : 338K C3 [2/20/2012 16:30:42 : pos11 : LGALLANT] REQ TO PC THE AREA [2/20/2012 16:30:34 : pos11 : LGALLANT] INF JUST LOST VISUAL LAST TIME HE SAW HIM HE TURNED AROUND AND WAS HEADING THE CORRECT DIRECTION NFD [2/20/2012 16:30:03 : pos11 : LGALLANT] CM LAS RAMBLAS NBH: 972B6 92624 33.46702,-117.669795 VEH TRAVELING EB IN THE WB LANES SILVER VEH POSS A VW NFD